Learning whom to cooperate with: neurocomputational mechanisms for choosing cooperative partners

Author:

Jin Tao1234,Zhang Shen123,Lockwood Patricia5678,Vilares Iris4,Wu Haiyan9,Liu Chao123ORCID,Ma Yina1210ORCID

Affiliation:

1. State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning and IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University , Beijing 100875 , China

2. Center for Collaboration and Innovation in Brain and Learning Sciences, Beijing Normal University , Beijing 100875 , China

3. Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University , Beijing, 100875 , China

4. Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota , 75 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN, 55455 , United States

5. Centre for Human Brain Health and Institute for Mental Health , School of Psychology, , Birmingham, B15 2TT , United Kingdom

6. University of Birmingham , School of Psychology, , Birmingham, B15 2TT , United Kingdom

7. Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford , Oxford, OX3 9DU , United Kingdom

8. Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford , Oxford, OX2 6GG , United Kingdom

9. Centre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Department of Psychology, University of Macau , Taipa, Macau SAR, 519000 , China

10. Chinese Institute for Brain Research , Beijing, 102206 , China

Abstract

Abstract Cooperation is fundamental for survival and a functioning society. With substantial individual variability in cooperativeness, we must learn whom to cooperate with, and often make these decisions on behalf of others. Understanding how people learn about the cooperativeness of others, and the neurocomputational mechanisms supporting this learning, is therefore essential. During functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning, participants completed a novel cooperation-partner-choice task where they learned to choose between cooperative and uncooperative partners through trial-and-error both for themselves and vicariously for another person. Interestingly, when choosing for themselves, participants made faster and more exploitative choices than when choosing for another person. Activity in the ventral striatum preferentially responded to prediction errors (PEs) during self-learning, whereas activity in the perigenual anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) signaled both personal and vicarious PEs. Multivariate pattern analyses showed distinct coding of personal and vicarious choice-making and outcome processing in the temporoparietal junction (TPJ), dorsal ACC, and striatum. Moreover, in right TPJ the activity pattern that differentiated self and other outcomes was associated with individual differences in exploitation tendency. We reveal neurocomputational mechanisms supporting cooperative learning and show that this learning is reflected in trial-by-trial univariate signals and multivariate patterns that can distinguish personal and vicarious choices.

Funder

National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals

Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission

National Key Research and Development Program of China

Major Project of National Social Science Foundation

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Cognitive Neuroscience

Reference67 articles.

1. What is for me is not for you: brain correlates of intertemporal choice for self and other;Albrecht;Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci,2011

2. The anterior cingulate gyrus and social cognition: tracking the motivation of others;Apps;Neuron,2016

3. Value-related neuronal responses in the human amygdala during observational learning;Aquino;J Neurosci,2020

4. Distinct encoding of decision confidence in human medial prefrontal cortex;Bang;Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,2018

5. Dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortex orchestrate normative choice;Baumgartner;Nat Neurosci,2011

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3