Development and validation of Physical Disability Index and Mental Disability Index and their associations with falls among older adults

Author:

Zhang Xuxi12,Sun Xinying12,Yin Pengbin3,Zhang ; Licheng3,Tang Peifu3,Zeng Yi45ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Social Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Peking University , Beijing 100191, China

2. Center for Healthy Aging, Peking University Health Science Center , Beijing 100191, China

3. Chinese National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedic, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation , Beijing, China

4. Center for Healthy Aging and Development Studies, National School of Development, Peking University , Beijing 100871, China

5. Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Medical School of Duke University, Durham , NC 27710, USA

Abstract

Abstract Background To enhance the precision of measuring, analyzing, and forecasting care needs for older adults with physical and/or mental disabilities, we developed the Physical Disability Index (PDI) and Mental Disability Index (MDI). Furthermore, we evaluated the reliability and validity of the PDI and MDI. Additionally, we investigate their associations with falls to further indicate the predictive validity. Methods A total of 11,621 older adults (53.1% women; mean age=83.2; SD=10.8) from 23 provinces in China were investigated in 2017-2018 to assess the reliability and validity of the PDI and MDI among older adults aged 65 to 105. Among which, 6,071 older adults with both baseline (2017-2018) and follow-up (2021) data were included in analyses to evaluate associations between the baseline health status determined by PDI and MDI and the number and severity of falls at baseline and follow-up. Cronbach's alpha was used to determine internal consistency. The convergent and divergent validity, known-group validity and concurrent validity were assessed. Multinomial logistic regression models were utilized to assess associations. Results We found satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha ≥0.70) of the PDI and MDI in the total sample and sex-specific subgroups. Our results support the convergent and divergent validity, known-group validity, and concurrent validity of the PDI and MDI. We also found baseline physical disability and comorbid physical and mental disability are associated with a higher risk of baseline and follow-up falls. Conclusions The PDI and MDI are reliable and valid instruments to assess physical and mental disability status among older adults respectively.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3