Good practice recommendations for the use of time-lapse technology†

Author:

Apter Susanna1,Ebner Thomas2,Freour Thomas3,Guns Yves4,Kovacic Borut5,Le Clef Nathalie6,Marques Monica7,Meseguer Marcos8,Montjean Debbie9,Sfontouris Ioannis10,Sturmey Roger11,Coticchio Giovanni12ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Livio, Stockholm, Sweden

2. Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Gynecological Endocrinology, Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Linz, Austria

3. Médecine de la Reproduction, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France

4. Center for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

5. Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecologic Endocrinology, Univerzitetni klinicni center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia

6. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, Grimbergen, Belgium

7. CEMEARE, Lisbon, Portugal

8. IVF Laboratory, Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, Valencia, Spain

9. Médecine et Biologie de la Reproduction, Hopital Saint Joseph, Marseille, France

10. Assisted Reproduction Unit, Eugonia, Athens, Greece

11. Centre for Atherothrombosis and Metabolic Disease, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK

12. 9.baby Family and Fertility Center, Bologna, Italy

Abstract

AbstractSTUDY QUESTIONWhat recommendations can be provided on the approach to and use of time-lapse technology (TLT) in an IVF laboratory?SUMMARY ANSWERThe present ESHRE document provides 11 recommendations on how to introduce TLT in the IVF laboratory.WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADYStudies have been published on the use of TLT in clinical embryology. However, a systematic assessment of how to approach and introduce this technology is currently missing.STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATIONA working group of members of the Steering Committee of the ESHRE Special Interest Group in Embryology and selected ESHRE members was formed in order to write recommendations on the practical aspects of TLT for the IVF laboratory.PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODSThe working group included 11 members of different nationalities with internationally recognized experience in clinical embryology and basic science embryology, in addition to TLT. This document is developed according to the manual for development of ESHRE recommendations for good practice. Where possible, the statements are supported by studies retrieved from a PUBMED literature search on ‘time-lapse’ and ART.MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCEA clear clinical benefit of the use of TLT, i.e. an increase in IVF success rates, remains to be proven. Meanwhile, TLT systems are being introduced in IVF laboratories. The working group listed 11 recommendations on what to do before introducing TLT in the lab. These statements include an assessment of the pros and cons of acquiring a TLT system, selection of relevant morphokinetic parameters, selection of an appropriate TLT system with technical and customer support, development of an internal checklist and education of staff. All these aspects are explained further here, based on the current literature and expert opinion.LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTIONOwing to the limited evidence available, recommendations are mostly based on clinical and technical expertise. The paper provides technical advice, but leaves any decision on whether or not to use TLT to the individual centres.WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGSThis document is expected to have a significant impact on future developments of clinical embryology, considering the increasing role and impact of TLT.STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)The meetings of the working group were funded by ESHRE. S.A. declares participation in the Nordic Embryology Academic Team with meetings sponsored by Gedeon Richter. T.E. declares to have organized workshops for Esco and receiving consulting fees from Ferring and Gynemed and speakers’ fees from Esco and honorarium from Merck and MSD. T.F. received consulting fees from Vitrolife and Laboratoires Genévrier, speakers’ fees from Merck Serono, Gedeon Richter, MSD and Ferring and research grants from Gedeon Richter and MSD. M.M. received sponsorship from Merck. M.M.E. received speakers’ fees from Merck, Ferring and MSD. R.S. received a research grant from ESHRE. G.C. received speakers’ fees from IBSA and Excemed. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERN/A.DISCLAIMERThis Good Practice Recommendations (GPR) document represents the views of ESHRE, which are the result of consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders and are based on the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation.ESHRE’s GPRs should be used for information and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. They do not replace the need for application of clinical judgment to each individual presentation, nor variations based on locality and facility type.Furthermore, ESHRE GPRs do not constitute or imply the endorsement, or favouring of any of the included technologies by ESHRE.†ESHRE Pages content is not externally peer reviewed. The manuscript has been approved by the Executive Committee of ESHRE.

Funder

European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Environmental Engineering

Reference222 articles.

1. Morphology vs morphokinetics: a retrospective comparison of inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists on blastocysts with known implantation outcome;Adolfsson;JBRA Assist. Reprod.,2018

2. The human first cell cycle: impact on implantation;Aguilar;Reprod Biomed Online,2014

3. Trophectoderm morphology: an important parameter for predicting live birth after single blastocyst transfer;Ahlstrom;Hum Reprod,2011

4. Comparison of the morphokinetic parameters of embryos according to ovarian reserve in IVF cycles;Akarsu;Gynecol Endocrinology,2017

5. Morphokinetic analysis of human embryo development and its relationship to the female age: a retrospective time-lapse imaging study;Akhter;Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-Grand),2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3