A global fuel characteristic model and dataset for wildfire prediction
-
Published:2024-01-17
Issue:1
Volume:21
Page:279-300
-
ISSN:1726-4189
-
Container-title:Biogeosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biogeosciences
Author:
McNorton Joe R., Di Giuseppe FrancescaORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Effective wildfire management and prevention strategies depend on accurate forecasts of fire occurrence and propagation. Fuel load and fuel moisture content are essential variables for forecasting fire occurrence, and whilst existing operational systems incorporate dead fuel moisture content, both live fuel moisture content and fuel load are either approximated or neglected. We propose a mid-complexity model combining data driven and analytical methods to predict fuel characteristics. The model can be integrated into earth system models to provide real-time forecasts and climate records taking advantage of meteorological variables, land surface modelling, and satellite observations. Fuel load and moisture is partitioned into live and dead fuels, including both wood and foliage components. As an example, we have generated a 10-year dataset which is well correlated with independent data and largely explains observed fire activity globally. While dead fuel moisture correlates highest with fire activity, live fuel moisture and load are shown to potentially enhance prediction skill. The use of observation data to inform a dynamical model is a crucial first step toward disentangling the contributing factors of fuel and weather to understand fire evolution globally. This dataset, with high spatiotemporal resolution (∼9 km, daily), is the first of its kind and will be regularly updated.
Funder
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference61 articles.
1. Agustí-Panareda, A., Massart, S., Chevallier, F., Balsamo, G., Boussetta, S., Dutra, E., and Beljaars, A.: A biogenic CO2 flux adjustment scheme for the mitigation of large-scale biases in global atmospheric CO2 analyses and forecasts, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10399–10418, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10399-2016, 2016. 2. Agustí-Panareda, A., Diamantakis, M., Massart, S., Chevallier, F., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Barré, J., Curcoll, R., Engelen, R., Langerock, B., Law, R. M., Loh, Z., Morguí, J. A., Parrington, M., Peuch, V.-H., Ramonet, M., Roehl, C., Vermeulen, A. T., Warneke, T., and Wunch, D.: Modelling CO2 weather – why horizontal resolution matters, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7347–7376, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7347-2019, 2019. 3. Badlan, R. L., Sharples, J. J., Evans, J. P., and McRae, R. H. D.: Factors influencing the development of violent pyroconvection. Part I: fire size and stability, Int. J. Wildland Fire, 30, 484–497, https://doi.org/10.1071/WF20040, 2021. 4. Boer, M. M., Nolan, R. H., Resco De Dios, V., Clarke, H., Price, O. F., and Bradstock, R. A.: Changing Weather Extremes Call for Early Warning of Potential for Catastrophic Fire, Earths Future, 5, 1196–1202, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000657, 2017. 5. Boussetta, S. and Balsamo, G.: Vegetation dataset of Land Use/Land Cover and Leaf Area Index. CONFESS-H2020, https://confessh2020.files.wordpress.com/2021/08/confess-d1-1-v1-0-.pdf (last access: 21 August 2023), 2021.
|
|