Mulch application as the overarching factor explaining increase in soil organic carbon stocks under conservation agriculture in two 8-year-old experiments in Zimbabwe
Author:
Shumba ArmwellORCID, Chikowo Regis, Thierfelder Christian, Corbeels Marc, Six JohanORCID, Cardinael RémiORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Conservation agriculture (CA), combining reduced or no tillage, permanent soil cover, and improved rotations, is often promoted as a climate-smart practice. However, our understanding of the impact of CA and its respective three principles on top- and subsoil organic carbon stocks in the low-input cropping systems of sub-Saharan Africa is rather limited. This study was conducted at two long-term experimental sites established in Zimbabwe in 2013. The soil types were abruptic Lixisols at Domboshava Training Centre (DTC) and xanthic Ferralsol at the University of Zimbabwe farm (UZF). The following six treatments, which were replicated four times, were investigated: conventional tillage (CT), conventional tillage with rotation (CTR), no tillage (NT), no tillage with mulch (NTM), no tillage with rotation (NTR), and no tillage with mulch and rotation (NTMR). Maize (Zea mays L.) was the main crop, and treatments with rotation included cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.). The soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration and soil bulk density were determined for samples taken from depths of 0–5, 5–10, 10–15, 15–20, 20–30, 30–40, 40–50, 50–75 and 75–100 cm. Cumulative organic inputs to the soil were also estimated for all treatments. SOC stocks at equivalent soil mass were significantly (p<0.05) higher in the NTM, NTR and NTMR treatments compared with the NT and CT treatments in the top 5 cm and top 10 cm layers at UZF, while SOC stocks were only significantly higher in the NTM and NTMR treatments compared with the NT and CT treatments in the top 5 cm at DTC. NT alone had a slightly negative impact on the top SOC stocks. Cumulative SOC stocks were not significantly different between treatments when considering the whole 100 cm soil profile. Our results show the overarching role of crop residue mulching in CA cropping systems with respect to enhancing SOC stocks but also that this effect is limited to the topsoil. The highest cumulative organic carbon inputs to the soil were observed in NTM treatments at the two sites, and this could probably explain the positive effect on SOC stocks. Moreover, our results show that the combination of at least two CA principles including mulch is required to increase SOC stocks in these low-nitrogen-input cropping systems.
Funder
Agropolis Fondation Total Foundation
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference101 articles.
1. Amos, B. and Walters, D. T.: Maize Root Biomass and Net Rhizodeposited Carbon, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 70, 1489–1503, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0216, 2006. 2. Angers, D. A. and Eriksen-Hamel, N. S.: Full-inversion tillage and organic carbon distribution in soil profiles: A meta-analysis, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 72, 1370–1374, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2007.0342, 2008. 3. Angers, D. A., Bolinder, M. A., Carter, M. R., Gregorich, E. G., Drury, C. F., Liang, B. C., Voroney, R. P., Simard, R. R., Donald, R. G., Bevaert, R. P., and Martel, J.: Impact of tillage practices on organic carbon and nitrogen storage in cool, humid soils of eastern Canada, Soil Till. Res., 41, 191–201, https://doi.org/10.4141/S96-111, 1997. 4. Bai, X., Huang, Y., Ren, W., Coyne, M., Jacinthe, P.-A., Bo, T., Hui, D., Yang, J., and Matocha, C.: Responses of soil carbon sequestration to climate-smart agriculture practices: A meta-analysis, Glob. Change Biol., 25, 2591–2606, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14658, 2019. 5. Balesdent, J., Derrien, D., Fontaine, S., Kirman, S., Klumpp, K., Loiseau, P., Marol, C., Nguyen, C., Pean, M., Personeni, E., and Robin, C.: Contribution de la rhizodéposition aux matières organiques du sol, quelques implications pour la modélisation de la dynamique du carbone, Etude Gest. des sols, 18, 201–216, 2011.
|
|