Assessment of uncertainties in soil erosion and sediment yield estimates at ungauged basins: an application to the Garra River basin, India
-
Published:2018-04-24
Issue:4
Volume:22
Page:2471-2485
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Swarnkar SomilORCID, Malini Anshu, Tripathi Shivam, Sinha RajivORCID
Abstract
Abstract. High soil erosion and excessive sediment load are serious problems in several
Himalayan river basins. To apply mitigation procedures, precise estimation of
soil erosion and sediment yield with associated uncertainties are needed.
Here, the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) and the sediment delivery
ratio (SDR) equations are used to estimate the spatial pattern of soil
erosion (SE) and sediment yield (SY) in the Garra River basin, a small
Himalayan tributary of the River Ganga. A methodology is proposed for quantifying
and propagating uncertainties in SE, SDR and SY estimates. Expressions for
uncertainty propagation are derived by first-order uncertainty analysis,
making the method viable even for large river basins. The methodology is
applied to investigate the relative importance of different RUSLE factors in
estimating the magnitude and uncertainties in SE over two distinct
morphoclimatic regimes of the Garra River basin, namely the upper mountainous
region and the lower alluvial plains. Our results suggest that average SE in the
basin is very high (23 ± 4.7 t ha−1 yr−1) with higher
values in the upper mountainous region
(92 ± 15.2 t ha−1 yr−1) compared to the lower alluvial
plains (19.3 ± 4 t ha−1 yr−1). Furthermore, the
topographic steepness (LS) and crop practice (CP) factors exhibit higher
uncertainties than other RUSLE factors. The annual average SY is estimated at
two locations in the basin – Nanak Sagar Dam (NSD) for the period 1962–2008
and Husepur gauging station (HGS) for 1987–2002. The SY at NSD and HGS are
estimated to be 6.9 ± 1.2 × 105 t yr−1 and
6.7 ± 1.4 × 106 t yr−1, respectively, and the
estimated 90 % interval contains the observed values of
6.4 × 105 t yr−1 and
7.2 × 106 t yr−1, respectively. The study demonstrated
the usefulness of the proposed methodology for quantifying uncertainty in SE
and SY estimates at ungauged basins.
Funder
Ministry of Earth Sciences
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference62 articles.
1. Amore, E., Modica, C., Nearing, M. A., and Santoro, V. C. Scale effect in
USLE and WEPP application for soil erosion computation from three Sicilian
basins, J. Hydrol., 293, 100–114, 2004. 2. Babu, R., Tejwani, K. G., Agarwal, M. C., and Bhushan, L. S. Distribution
of erosion index and iso-erodent map of India, Ind. J. Soil
Conservation, 1978. 3. Beven, K. J. and Brazier, R. E. Dealing with uncertainty in erosion model
predictions, Handbook of Erosion Modelling, 52–79, 2011. 4. Bhattarai, R. and Dutta, D. Estimation of soil erosion and sediment yield
using GIS at catchment scale, Water Resour. Manage., 21, 1635–1647,
2007. 5. Biesemans, J., Van Meirvenne, M., and Gabriels, D.: Extending the RUSLE with
the Monte Carlo error propagation technique to predict long-term average
off-site sediment accumulation, J. Soil Water Conservat., 55, 35–42, 2000.
Cited by
72 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|