Brief communication: Lessons learned and experiences gained from building up a global survey on societal resilience to changing droughts
-
Published:2024-07-01
Issue:6
Volume:24
Page:2165-2173
-
ISSN:1684-9981
-
Container-title:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
de Macedo Marina Batalini, Benso Marcos Roberto, Sass Karina Simone, Mendiondo Eduardo MarioORCID, da Silva Greicelene JesusORCID, da Silva Pedro Gustavo Câmara, Shrimpton Elisabeth, Sarmah Tanaya, Huo Da, Jacobson Michael, Konak AbdullahORCID, Balta-Ozkan Nazmiye, Nardocci Adelaide Cassia
Abstract
Abstract. This paper describes the process of creating a global survey of experts to evaluate drought resilience indicators. The lessons learned include five main points: (1) the heterogeneity in the conceptual background should be minimized before the construction of the survey; (2) large numbers of indicators decrease the engagement of respondents through the survey, and ways to apportion indicators whilst maintaining reliability should be considered; (3) it is necessary to design the survey to balance response rate and accuracy; (4) the survey questions should have clear statements with a logical and flowing structure; and (5) reaching experts with different domain experience and representing different regions is difficult but crucial to minimize biased results.
Funder
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference21 articles.
1. Alshehri, S. A., Rezgui, Y., and Li, H: Delphi-based consensus study into a framework of community resilience to disaster, Nat. Hazards, 75, 2221–2245, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1423-x, 2015. 2. Bachmair, S., Stahl, K., Collins, K., Hannaford, J., Acreman, M., Svoboda, M., Knutson, C., Smith, K. H., Wall, N., Fuchs, B., Crossman, N. D., and Overton, I. C: Drought indicators revisited: the need for a wider consideration of environment and society, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water, 3, 516–536, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1154, 2016. 3. Baker, E., Bosetti, V., Jenni, K. E., and Ricci, E. C.: Facing the experts: Survey mode and expert elicitation, FEEM Working Paper No. 1, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2384487, 2014. 4. Blauhut, V.: The triple complexity of drought risk analysis and its visualisation via mapping: a review across scales and sectors, Earth-Sci. Rev., 210, 103345, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103345, 2020. 5. Crispim, D. L., Progênio, M. F., and Fernandes, L. L: Proposal for a tool for assessing access to water in rural communities: a case study in the brazilian semi-arid, Environ. Manage., 69, 529–542, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01600-3, 2022.
|
|