Characteristics of damage to buildings by debris flows on 7 August 2010 in Zhouqu, Western China
-
Published:2012-07-18
Issue:7
Volume:12
Page:2209-2217
-
ISSN:1684-9981
-
Container-title:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Hu K. H.,Cui P.,Zhang J. Q.
Abstract
Abstract. A debris-flow catastrophe hit the city of Zhouqu, Gansu Province, western China, at midnight on 7 August 2010 following a local extreme rainfall of 77.3 mm h−1 in the Sanyanyu and Luojiayu ravines, which are located to the north of the urban area. Eight buildings damaged in the event were investigated in detail to study the characteristics and patterns of damage to buildings by debris flows. It was found that major structural damage was caused by the frontal impact of proximal debris flows, while non-structural damage was caused by lateral accumulation and abrasion of sediment. The impact had a boundary decreasing effect when debris flows encountered a series of obstacles, and the inter-positioning of buildings produced so-called back shielding effects on the damage. Impact, accumulation, and abrasion were the three main patterns of damage to buildings in this event. The damage scale depended not only on the flow properties, such as density, velocity, and depth, but also on the structural strength of buildings, material, orientation, and geometry. Reinforced concrete-framed structures can effectively resist a much higher debris-flow impact than brick-concrete structures. With respect to the two typical types of structure, a classification scheme to assess building damage is proposed by referring to the Chinese Classification System of Earthquake Damage to Buildings. Furthermore, three damage scales (major structural, minor structural, and non-structural damage) are defined by critical values of impact pressure. Finally, five countermeasures for effectively mitigating the damage are proposed according to the on-site investigation.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference25 articles.
1. Barbolini, M., Cappabianca, F., and Sailer, R.: Empirical estimate of vulnerability relations for use in snow avalanche risk assessment, in: Risk analysis IV, edited by: Brebbia, C., WIT Press, Southampton, 533–542, 2004. 2. Evans, S. G., Bishop, N. F., Smoll, L. F., Murillo, P. V., Delaney, K. B., and Oliver-Smith, A.: A re-examination of the mechanism and human impact of catastrophic mass flows originating on Nevado Huascarán, Cordillera Blanca, Peru in 1962 and 1970, Eng. Geol., 108, 96–118, 2009. 3. Fuchs, S., Heiss, K., and Hübl, J.: Towards an empirical vulnerability function for use in debris flow risk assessment, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 7, 495–506, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-7-495-2007, 2007. 4. Haugen, E. D. and Kaynia, A. M.: Vulnerability of structures impacted by debris flow, Landslides and Engineered Slopes, edited by: Chen, Z., Zhang, J.-M., Ho, K., Wu, F.-Q., and Li, Z.-K., Taylor and Francis Group, London, 381–387, 2008. 5. Holub, M., Suda, J., and Fuchs, S.: Mountain hazards: reducing vulnerability by adapted building design, Environ. Earth Sci., in press, online first, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1410-4, 2012.
Cited by
100 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|