CLASH – Climate-responsive Land Allocation model with carbon Storage and Harvests
-
Published:2024-04-17
Issue:7
Volume:17
Page:3041-3062
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Ekholm TommiORCID, Freistetter Nadine-Cyra, Rautiainen AapoORCID, Thölix Laura
Abstract
Abstract. The Climate-responsive Land Allocation model with carbon Storage and Harvests (CLASH) is a global, biophysical land-use model that can be embedded into integrated assessment models (IAMs). CLASH represents vegetation growth, terrestrial carbon stocks, and production from agriculture and forestry for different land uses in a changing climate. Connecting CLASH to an IAM would allow the consideration of terrestrial carbon stocks, agriculture and forestry in global climate policy analyses. All terrestrial ecosystems and their carbon dynamics are comprehensively described at a coarse resolution. Special emphasis is placed on representing the world's forests. Vegetation growth, soil carbon stocks, agricultural yields and natural disturbance frequencies react to changing climatic conditions, emulating the dynamic global vegetation model LPJ-GUESS. Land is divided into 10 biomes with six land-use classes (including forests and agricultural classes). Secondary forests are age structured. The timing of forest harvests affects forest carbon stocks, and, hence, carbon storage per forest area can be increased through forest management. In addition to secondary forests, CLASH also includes primary ecosystems, cropland and pastures. The comprehensive inclusion of all land-use classes and their main functions allows representing the global land-use competition. In this article, we present, calibrate and validate the model; demonstrate its use; and discuss how it can be integrated into IAMs.
Funder
Research Council of Finland
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference58 articles.
1. Ahlström, A., Schurgers, G., and Smith, B.: The large influence of climate model bias on terrestrial carbon cycle simulations, Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 014004, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/12/1/014004, 2017. 2. Bar-On, Y. M., Phillips, R., and Milo, R.: The biomass distribution on Earth, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 6506–6511, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711842115, 2018. 3. Beyer, R. M., Hua, F., Martin, P. A., Manica, A., and Rademacher, T.: Relocating croplands could drastically reduce the environmental impacts of global food production, Commun. Earth. Environ., 3, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00360-6, 2022. 4. Daigneault, A., Baker, J. S., Guo, J., Lauri, P., Favero, A., Forsell, N., Johnston, C., Ohrel, S. B., and Sohngen, B.: How the future of the global forest sink depends on timber demand , forest management, and carbon policies, Global Environ. Chang., 76, 102582, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102582, 2022. 5. Daioglou, V., Doelman, J. C., Wicke, B., Faaij, A., and van Vuuren, D. P.: Integrated assessment of biomass supply and demand in climate change mitigation scenarios, Global Environ. Chang., 54, 88–101, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.012, 2019.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|