Comparative study of online learning and face-to-face learning

Author:

Sun Rongtan

Abstract

Online learning is prompted by the pandemic and has become the second main learning method. Considering the differences between face-to-face (F2F) and online learning, there should be significant differences in students’ learning experiences between the two learning methods. This study uses a course experience questionnaire (CEQ) and an online course experience questionnaire (OCEQ) to investigate and compare students’ perceptions of two learning methods from six factors. The result indicates that the differences between the two learning methods are significant in terms of the total score of the questionnaire, the factor of good teaching (GT), the factor of clear goals (CG) and the factor of appropriate assessment (AA). The lack of social interaction on campus could be the reason for this phenomenon based on the theory of constructionism. That suggests online learning platforms and instructors take more action to increase the interactivity of online learning to motivate students. The difference in the factor of emphasis on independence is not significant, which is inconsistent with the findings from the previous study. The reason could be attributed to the increasing flexibility of the combined learning methods.

Publisher

EDP Sciences

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3