Comparing the outcomes and costs of cardiac monitoring with implantable loop recorders and mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry following stroke using real-world evidence

Author:

Norlock Vincent1ORCID,Vazquez Reynaldo2ORCID,Dunn Alexandria2ORCID,Siegfried Christian3,Wadhwa Manish2,Medic Goran4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Philips, Rosemont, IL 60018, USA

2. Philips, San Diego, CA 92130, USA

3. Veranex Solutions, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA

4. Philips, Eindhoven, Netherlands

Abstract

Aim: Patients with ischemic stroke (IS) commonly undergo monitoring to identify atrial fibrillation with mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry (MCOT) or implantable loop recorders (ILRs). The authors compared readmission, healthcare cost and survival in patients monitored post-stroke with either MCOT or ILR. Materials & methods: The authors used claims data from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics ® Data Mart Database to identify patients with IS hospitalized from January 2017 to December 2020 who were prescribed ambulatory cardiac monitoring via MCOT or ILR. They compared the costs associated with the initial inpatient visit as well as the rate and causes of readmission, survival and healthcare costs over the following 18 months. Datasets were balanced using patient baseline and hospitalization characteristics. Multivariable generalized linear gamma regression was used for cost comparisons. Cox proportional hazard regression was used for survival and readmission analysis. Sub-cohorts were analyzed based on the severity of the index IS. Results: In 2244 patients, readmissions were significantly lower in the MCOT monitored group (30.2%) compared with the ILR group (35.4%) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.23; 95% CI: 1.04–1.46). Average cost over 18 months starting with the index IS was $27,429 (USD) lower in the MCOT group (95% CI: $22,353–$32,633). Survival difference bordered on statistical significance and trended to lower mortality in MCOT (8.9%) versus ILR (11.3%) (HR 1.30; 95% CI: 1:00–1.69), led by significance in patients with complications or comorbidities with the index event (MCOT 7.5%, ILR 11.5%; HR 1.62; 95% CI: 1.11–2.36). Conclusion: The use of MCOT versus ILR as the primary monitor following IS was associated with significant decreases in readmission, lower costs for the initial IS and total care over the next 18 months, significantly lower mortality for patients with complications and comorbidities at the index stroke, and a trend toward improved survival across all patients.

Publisher

Becaris Publishing Limited

Reference52 articles.

1. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics – 2023 Update: a report from the American Heart Association;Tsao CW;Circulation,2023

2. 2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: a report of US and global data from the American Heart Association;Martin SS;Circulation,2024

3. Costs of hospitalization for stroke patients aged 18–64 years in the United States;Wang G;J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis.,2014

4. Mortalidade por acidente vascular cerebral isquêmico e tempo de chegada a hospital: análise dos primeiros 90 dias;Moraes MA;Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP,2023

5. The second report of the Cerebral Embolism Task Force;Cardiogenic brain embolism;Arch. Neurol.,1989

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3