Phases of systemic inflammation in septic and haemorrhagic shocks

Author:

Solmatina Liliya V.,Zotova Natalia V.,Zhuravleva Yulia A.,Brazhnikov Anatoliy Yu.,Gusev Eugeny Y.

Abstract

Shocks of different origin (both septic and aseptic) be be considered clinical equivalents of systemic inflammation (SI) with following main manifestations : pronounced hypercytokinemia, other markers of systemic inflammatory response (SIR), coagulopathy, multiple organ failure (MOF), hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) distress, systemic tissue alteration. In general, these phenomena are directly and inversely related to systemic microcirculatory disturbances which determine the pathogenesis of distinct shock states. The aim of our study was to identify the features of SI phases in the development of two variants of septic shock, i.e., acute course (first week of the process) and prolonged/subacute sepsis (2 to 6 weeks from the onset of manifestations), as well as haemorrhagic shock studied 4-12 hours from the onset of massive blood loss. To verify the SI phases, we used the previously proposed SI scale, including the value of six SIR levels (RL-0-5), as well as additional criteria of SI, i.e., evaluation of clinical MOF grade (SOFA scale), plasma D-dimers ( 500 ng/mL), cortisol ( 1380 nmol/mL), tissue alteration markers, e.g., myoglobin ( 800 ng/mL) and/or troponin I ( 0.2 ng/mL). To calculate RL in SIR, plasma CRP and four cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF) were determined. The presence of SI was established if the SI scale exceeded 5 points (numerical RL values + presence of additional criteria, each equal to 1 point). The time and severity of the developing critical state, as well as the RL scores, were taken into account when reviewing the phases. There were three main SI phases: (1) evolving condition, (2) cytokine storm/phlogogenic hit (SD-4-5), and depressive (exhausting) phase. The latter was characterized by relatively low SIR values (RL-2-3). The lethality rate for shock in the presence of acute sepsis (n = 13) was 71.4%, reaching 94.1% in prolonged sepsis (n = 17). For haemorrhagic shock after massive blood loss, if not resolved within 24 hoursm the mortality rates was 53.8% (n = 13). Development of shock in acute sepsis, and haemorrhagic shock (within 4 to 12 hours after the onset of massive blood loss) is accompanied by the severity of critical-phase cytokine storm/PPS with a predominance of RL-5 in cases of lethal outcomes, and by a depression phase (RL-2-3) in prolonged sepsis. Overall mortality (for all groups) was 66.7% in the PS phase, 89.5% in the depressive phase and 15.4% in the evolvingl phase of haemorrhagic shock (with possible transition from this phase to the more critical SI phases until lethal outcome). Shock states of both septic and aseptic origin are based on a typical pathological process of SI, which should be distinguished from the signs of SIR characteristic of high-intensity canonical inflammation. It is characterized by higher cytokinemia (cytokine storm phase) or by the presence of additional SI phenomena with relatively moderate SIR levels (depressive SI phase). Thus, the depressive phase of SI is more fatal for disease outcome compared to the cytokine storm phase with higher intensity of SIR.

Publisher

Russian Society of Immunology

Subject

Immunology,General Medicine

Reference11 articles.

1. CYTOKINE RESPONSE AND OTHER DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CRITICAL PHASES OF SEPSIS-ASSOCIATED SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATION

2. Sepsis-3: new edition — old problems. analysis from the perspective of general pathology

3. Гусев Е.Ю., Черешнев В.А. Системное воспаление: теоретические и методологические подходы к описанию модели общепатологического процесса. Часть. 4. Динамика процесса // Патологическая физиология и экспериментальная терапия, 2014. Т. 58, № 4. С. 4-16. [Gusev E.Yu., Chereshnev V.A. Systemic inflammation: theoretical and methodological approaches to description of general pathological process model. Part IV. A dynamics of the process. Patologicheskaya fiziologiya i eksperimentalnaya terapiya = Pathological Physiology and Experimental Therapy, 2014, Vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 4-16. (In Russ.)]

4. Brazhnikov A., Zotova N., Solomatina L., Sarapultsev A., Spirin A., Gusev E. Shock-associated systemic inflammation in amniotic fluid embolism, complicated by clinical death. Pathophysiology, 2023, Vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 48-62.

5. Eastridge B.J., Holcomb J.B., Shackelford S. Outcomes of traumatic hemorrhagic shock and the epidemiology of preventable death from injury. Transfusion, 2019, Vol. 59, no. S2, pp. 1423-1428.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3