Reliability, Quality, and Science popularity of Diabetes Knowledge Information in China Video Sharing Platform: A Cross-sectional Study (Preprint)

Author:

Sun Kexin,Cui Chen,Mu Fei,Tang Meng,Gong Rui,Yan Zhen,Zhao JinyiORCID,Wang Jingwen

Abstract

BACKGROUND

More and more diabetes individuals are using internet video platforms for self-management of blood glucose in China. TikTok, WeChat and Bilibili, have gained popularity because of the easy access to health information. However, the quality, reliability and science popularity of health information on these platforms have still not been fully assessed, and studies comparing the three platforms are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

A cross-sectional study was established to evaluate the reliability, quality and science popularity of diabetes health information in Chinese Internet video platforms.

METHODS

This study used 'diabetes' as a keyword to identify the top 100 videos meeting the specified criteria on each platform, resulting in 300 videos. The modified DISCERN score, the Journal of the American Medical Association Score (JAMAS) benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Scores (GQS) were employed to assess the reliability of videos. This study developed criteria to evaluate the scientific popularity of the platforms. Each video was assessed based on the health information categories recommended by the Chinese Diabetes Guidelines (2022).

RESULTS

Of the videos retrieved, 68.67% (206/300) were released by certified medical professionals. Diet was the most frequently discussed topic (83%). TikTok achieved the lowest DISCERN scores (median 2, IQR:2.00) compared with Bilibili (median 3, IQR: 2.00) and WeChat (median 3, IQR: 0.00). The median JAMA criterion score was 3 (IQR:1.00) for all three platforms. The science popularity score of Bilibili (median 80, IQR: 13.75) was highest. The overall GQS quality of Bilibili (median: grade 3) and WeChat (median: grade 3) was higher than the TikTok platform (median 2). Among diabetes guideline scores, the highest median score was Bilibili (median 2, IQR: 3.00), which was higher than TikTok (median 1, IQR 1.00) and WeChat (median 1, IQR 1.00). The science popularity of medical professionals was significantly lower than non-medical professionals.

CONCLUSIONS

Information from Chinese Internet video platforms is generally of fairly reliable quality. Bilibili received the best quality, reliability and popularity of science compared with TikTok and WeChat. All three platforms cover little information about medication. Health professionals should be encouraged to produce high-quality diabetes health science popularization works to enhance the standard of scientific communication.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3