Patterns and perceptions of standard order set use across a multi-hospital system (Preprint)

Author:

Naicker SundresanORCID,Tariq AminaORCID,Donovan RaeleneORCID,Magon HonorORCID,White NicoleORCID,Simmons JoshuaORCID,McPhail StevenORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic standard order sets automate ordering of specific treatment, testing and investigative protocols by physicians. Despite their routine implementation within Electronic Medical Records (EMRs), little is understood regarding how they are used and what are the factors’ that influence their adoption in practice.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to i) describe patterns of use of standard order sets within a multi-hospital healthcare system; and ii) explore and map clinicians’ perceptions of use to a behavioural model (COM-B).

METHODS

Quantitative data on standard order sets use from five hospitals was captured over five-month intervals for three years (2019, 2020, 2021). Qualitative Data comprising of unstructured and semi-structured interviews (n=15) was collected and analysed using a reflexive thematic approach. Interview themes were then mapped to a theory-informed model of behaviour change (COM-B) to identify determinants of use in routine clinical practice.

RESULTS

Total count of standard order sets use across the health system in the 2019 observation period was 267 253, increasing to 293 950 and 335 066 in 2020 and 2021, respectively. There was a change in use toward specialty order sets that had received upgrades in the study period. There were four emergent themes related to order set use derived from clinician interviews: i) Knowledge and Skills; ii) Perceptions; iii) Technical Dependencies; and iv) Unintended Consequences which were mapped to the COM-B model. Findings suggest a user preference for customised order sets, in response to local context and user experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Sustained and continuous uptake for appropriate CPOE use may require implementation strategies associated with capability, opportunity, and motivational influencers of behaviour.

CLINICALTRIAL

NA

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3