Surgical residents' perceptions of feedback: a scoping review to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement in surgical education (Preprint)

Author:

da Silva Costa Carlos DarioORCID,Silva Gabriela GouveaORCID,dos Santos Emerson RobertoORCID,Engel Ana Maria Rita Pedroso Vilela Torres de CarvalhoORCID,Costa Ana Caroline dos SantosORCID,Lima Alba Regina de AbreuORCID,Brienze Vânia MSORCID,Oliani Denise Cristina Móz VazORCID,Oliani Antonio HélioORCID,André Júlio CésarORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Feedback is essential for learning and improving medical education and surgery performance. Surgery residents recognize the importance of feedback for their development, but there is a lack of understanding regarding their perception of the feedback received during training.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aims to identify and map out data from studies that report surgical residents' perceptions of the feedback received during their education, analyze them, determine knowledge gaps, and disseminate the research findings.

METHODS

A comprehensive search strategy was performed on March 15, 2024, using descriptors in English, Portuguese, and Spanish, encompassing the period since 2017. Databases of journals indexed in Medline, Directory of Open Access Journals, Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources, Academic Search Premier, BioMed Central Open Access, and Wiley-Blackwell were consulted. Studies involving resident physicians of any surgical specialty and their perceptions of feedback received during surgical education were included. Data were extracted, described, and analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively.

RESULTS

Thirteen articles were included in the review, with most studies being conducted in the United States (76.9%). The majority of the studies were primary (92.3%), retrospective (66.6%), and involved general surgery residents (53.8%). Most of the articles did not mention the method or instrument used to provide feedback. The feedback content varied, with intraoperative skills being the most prevalent theme (46.1%). Residents' perceptions of feedback were heterogeneous, with general and overall perceptions being the most reported (92.3%). A comparison between residents' and attendings' perceptions revealed discrepancies in the frequency and quality of feedback. The impact of feedback was measured in only 15.4% of the articles, portraying positive outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review reveals that most studies focus on comparing perceptions, ideal feedback characteristics, or general perceptions without emphasizing the impact of feedback. There is a lack of detailed descriptions of feedback perception and standardized instruments to measure it. Future research should focus on developing standardized instruments and investigating the impact of feedback on surgical residents' learning outcomes. The findings of this scoping review can inform educators and policymakers in improving surgical training programs and enhancing residents' learning progress.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT

RR2-10.2196/56727

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3