eHealth Literacy and associated factors among Danish adults in the Central Denmark Region: a cross-sectional study (Preprint)

Author:

Strøm JanniORCID,Pedersen Pernille BlomORCID,Nielsen Susanne Nygaard,Kjærgaard-Andersen Anne Marie,Kayser LarsORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

If the full potential of digital health information is to be realized, it is necessary to consider whether recipients have the required abilities to access, understand and use the information. Digitization has moved information delivery into a digital context, demanding both sufficient health literacy (HL) and digital literacy (DL). Limited HL is quite prevalent, associated with poorer health outcomes and is found to have a negative social gradient. The level of DL is an important determinant for the use of digital services; however, it is not always related to age, gender, or education.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to characterise variations concerning the level of HL and DL among a patient population to provide insight into specific areas to be addressed when communicating health information using digital media, helping to accommodate specific needs by personalising the content.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study. From September to December 2020, participants were included from nine hospital departments at three sites. Adult participants (18+) or adult parents or guardians of a child were included if they were summoned for examination, treatment, or hospitalisation and if they could read and understand Danish. The survey consisted of a questionnaire soliciting sociodemographic data and the eHLA toolkit. Data analysis included descriptive and exploratory statistical analyses and K-mean clustering to develop profiles.

RESULTS

A total of 923 participants participated, of whom 54.2% were female. The mean age was 61.5 years (range 18-93). Most participants presented vocational training (28.4%). Most participants were cohabitating (75.2%), and 61.2% indicated having a chronic disease. Five profiles were developed. Three of these, equivalent to one-third of the participants, experienced difficulties accessing health information in a digital context.

CONCLUSIONS

In three profiles, approximately one-third of the total participants may experience difficulties accessing health information in a digital context. Individuals with a higher age and lower level of education are more prevalent in profiles with low eHL compared to those with high eHL. Females at a lower age seem more inclined to obtain health information than males. At a higher age; however, not in a digital context. Having a chronic illness can provide a discrepancy in HL scores, as illness can provide knowledge of health concepts, and lack of illness the opposite. To minimise the risk of inequity introduced by digitalization and unrecognised inadequate levels of eHL amongst patients, it is essential for a successful exploitation of digital health information that efforts are made to motivate and engage the patients to seek out and engage with online health resources, and that the approach is individualised and accommodates the skillset of the recipients.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3