Exploring the Icarus Paradox in the Specialist Doctor Education System in Indonesia: Public Perspective from Online Media (Preprint)

Author:

Binsar FaisalORCID,Hamsal MohammadORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Paradox refers to the tension between the ambition to succeed as a medical specialist and the limitations of the medical education system. Indonesia has big ambitions to produce quality doctors, but there are limited infrastructure and resources that limit the educational journey of prospective specialist doctors.

OBJECTIVE

This research aims to determine the Icarus paradox in the medical education system, which describes prospective specialist medical students, and the quality of health services in Indonesia. Understand how the Icarus paradox is reflected in society's perspective on medical education by paying attention to the quality of services provided.

METHODS

Using a mixed methods approach, integrating quantitative and qualitative analysis.

RESULTS

This results in three cognitive perspectives that show the existence of the Icarus paradox in the Indonesian medical education system, namely the education system perspective, society's view of students, and the health service perspective. Although there are aspirations to improve the quality of health services and medical education, there are also structural challenges that hinder the journey of the medical profession. Students who are prospective specialist doctors face various problems, the quality of health services in Indonesia is influenced by limited resources and accessibility. This perspective was developed into a conceptual model.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides valuable insight into the Icarus paradox in the context of the medical education system in Indonesia, highlighting its complexity and emphasizing the importance of reform in medical education. This research has limitations, primarily relying on online reviews that may not be representative of the entire population, and primarily focusing on the views of the public and students, thus potentially introducing subjective bias. Therefore, these findings emphasize the importance of improving medical education and health services to effectively address the challenges faced by medical professionals.

CLINICALTRIAL

-

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3