Title: ChatGPT, Google Assistant: Which is best for patients with amblyopia? (Preprint)

Author:

Wu GloriaORCID,Lee DavidORCID,Zhao Weichen ZhaoORCID,Wong AdrialORCID,Jhangiani Rohan,Kurniawan Sri

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We queried ChatGPT and Google Assistant about amblyopia and compared its answers to the keywords found in the website of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, section for amblyopia. Of the 26 keywords chosen from website: ChatGPT included 11/26 in its responses while Google included 8/26.

OBJECTIVE

Our study investigates ChatGPT-3.5TM and Google assistantTM’s adherence to the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus’ (AAPOS) guidelines for patient education of amblyopia.

METHODS

ChatGPT-3.5 was used, available from November 30, 2022. The 4 questions were taken from American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus’s website (AAPOS.org), specifically its glossary section for amblyopia: 1) What is amblyopia? 2) What causes amblyopia? 3) How is amblyopia treated? 4) What happens if amblyopia is untreated? Approved and selected by Dr. Gloria Wu and Dr. David Lee, the keywords from AAPOS.org were words or phrases that are deemed significant to the education of patients with amblyopia. The “Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level” formula, approved by the US Department of Education, was used to evaluate the reading comprehension level for the ChatGPT, Google Assistant, and AAPOS responses.

RESULTS

In their responses, ChatGPT did not mention the term “ophthalmologist” whereas Google Assistant and AAPOS.org both mentioned the term once, and twice respectively. ChatGPT did, however, use the term “eye doctors” once. From the Flesch- Kincaid test, AAPOS.org reading level was 11.4 ± 2.1, the lowest level. Google displayed 13.1 ± 4.8, the highest required reading level while also having the greatest variation in grade level in its responses. ChatGPT answers scored 12.4 ± 1.1. They were all similar in terms of level of difficulty in reading. For the key words, of the 4 responses, ChatGPT used the keywords 11/26 times, and Google Assistant 8/26 times.

CONCLUSIONS

ChatGPT trains on texts and phrases and generates new sentences vs. Google Assistant automatically copies website links. As ophthalmologists, through our websites and journals, we should consider encoding “see an ophthalmologist” in our websites. While ChatGPT is here to stay, we, as physicians, need to monitor its answers.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3