Effectiveness and acceptability of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for fear of cancer recurrence: a systematic review (Preprint)

Author:

Yang XinORCID,Wei FangxinORCID,Li Qiugui,Chen Meixue,Zhang Shuxian,Lin QingranORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cognitive behavioral therapy can be effective in treating negative cancer psychology, and since fear of cancer recurrence seriously troubles cancer patients or survivors, digitalized cognitive behavioral therapy may improve the strategy used to treat FCR. There is no evidence that focuses specifically on digitalized cognitive behavioral therapy for FCR in cancer patients or survivors.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness and acceptability of digitalized CBT for FCR in cancer patients or survivors.

METHODS

Seven databases were systematically searched (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and Scopus) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from the database build to April 6, 2023. The PRISMA guidelines were followed, and the protocol was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. The included literature was evaluated using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (ROB2).

RESULTS

This review identified nine studies from five countries (the Netherlands, China, Australia, Germany, and Ireland) published between 2017 and 2023. Sample sizes ranged from 57 to 363 individuals. Text, images, video, games, interactive features, and peer group conversations were some of the technical components employed in the intervention. Digital CBT therapies for FCR in cancer patients or survivors were shown to be successful, as evidenced by the intervention group's better results when compared to those of the control group (Hedges g = -1.60, 95% CI: -2.44 to -0.77; p<0.01). The acceptability of this study showed positive results based on user feedback, with most studies having a failure rate of less than 15%. Most studies had a high risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed promising evidence when it came to efficacy and positive outcomes for FCR, and user feedback was positive. However, the overall risk of bias indicates that the effectiveness of the intervention needs to be interpreted with caution.

CLINICALTRIAL

PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42023427748.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3