The Validity of Impressions as a Media Dose Metric in a Tobacco Public Education Campaign Evaluation (Preprint)

Author:

Davis KevinORCID,Curry LaurelORCID,Bradfield BrianORCID,Stupplebeen David AORCID,Williams Rebecca JORCID,Soria SandraORCID,Lautsch JulieORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evaluation research increasingly needs alternatives to target/gross rating points to comprehensively measure total exposure to modern multi-channel public education campaigns that use multiple channels, including TV, radio, digital video and paid social media, among others. Ratings data typically only captures delivery of broadcast media (TV and radio) and excludes other channels.

OBJECTIVE

Studies are needed to validate cross-channel metrics such as impressions against self-reported exposure to campaign messages.

METHODS

We analyzed over 3 years of ad impressions from the California Tobacco Prevention Program’s (CTPP) statewide tobacco education campaigns from August 2019 through December 2022. Impressions data varied across designated market areas (DMAs) and across time. These data were merged to individual respondents from 45 waves of online survey data of Californians ages 18-55 (n=151,649). Impressions were merged to respondents based on respondents’ DMAs and time of survey completion. We used logistic regression to estimate the odds of respondents’ campaign recall as a function of cumulative and past-3-month impressions delivered to each respondent’s DMA.

RESULTS

Cumulative impressions were positively and significantly associated with recall of each of the Flavors Hook Kids (OR = 1.15, p < 0.001), Dark Balloons/Apartment (OR = 1.20, p < 0.001), We Are Not Profit (OR = 1.36, p < 0.001), Tell Your Story (EVALI; OR = 1.06, p < 0.05), and Thrown Away/Little Big Lies (OR = 1.05, p < 0.01) campaigns. Impressions delivered in the past 3 months were associated with recall of the Flavors Hook Kids (OR = 1.13, p < 0.001), Dark Balloons/Apartment (OR = 1.08, p < 0.001), We Are Not Profit (OR = 1.14, p < 0.001), and Thrown Away/Little Big Lies (OR = 1.04, p < 0.001) campaigns. Past 3-month impressions were not significantly associated with Tell Your Story campaign recall. Overall, magnitudes of these associations were greater for cumulative impressions. We visualize recall based on post-estimation predicted values from our multivariate logistic regression models.

CONCLUSIONS

Variation in cumulative impressions for CTPP’s long-term multi-channel tobacco education campaign is predictive of increased self-reported campaign recall, suggesting that impressions may be a valid proxy for potential campaign exposure. The use of impressions for purposes of evaluating public education campaigns may help address current methodological limitations arising from the fragmented nature of modern multi-channel media campaigns.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3