Evaluation of an Online-Based Self-Help Program for Patients With Panic Disorder - A Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

Author:

Lalk ChristopherORCID,Väth Teresa,Hanraths SofieORCID,Prüssner LuiseORCID,Timm ChristinaORCID,Hartmann SteffenORCID,Barnow SvenORCID,Rubel JulianORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Panic disorder, with and without agoraphobia, can be a highly debilitating disorder leading to functional impariments, increased risk of developing comorbidities, and a reduced quality of life. Panic disorder comes with a higher economic burden than other anxiety disorder, mainly due to absenteeism.

OBJECTIVE

The present study evaluated the effectiveness of a minimally-guided online self-help intervention for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia. As our primary hypotheses, we expected the intervention to improve both panic symptoms and well-being.

METHODS

German-speaking patients (N=156) between 18 and 65 with internet access and a diagnosis of panic disorder or agoraphobia with panic disorder were recruited for this randomized controlled trial. The intervention group (N=84) received access to a 12-week online self-help program. The waitlist control group (N=72) received care as usual during the study period and was offered the prospect of using the program after 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Changes in PAS revealed a significant effect in favor of the intervention group (t (df=110.1)=-2.22, padj=.027) with a small to moderate effect size (d=-0.37, 95%-CI: -0.70; -0.04). No significant effect was found for the second primary outcome WHO-5 (t (df=149.8)=1.35, padj=.088) or the secondary outcomes functioning, mental health literacy, working ability and healthcare use).

CONCLUSIONS

The presented online intervention can help reduce the core symptomatology of panic disorder with or without agoraphobia. Diminished effects may be due to higher illness burden in the intervention group and possibly the COVID pandemic which caused unique challenges to patients suffering from panic disorder. Regarding well-being and the secondary outcomes, superiority towards the control group was not established. Therefore, further research and intervention adaptations may be warranted to improve these outcomes.

CLINICALTRIAL

https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00023800

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3