Predictive performance and impact of algorithms in remote monitoring of chronic conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis (Preprint)

Author:

Castelyn GrantORCID,Laranjo LilianaORCID,Schreier Günter,Gallego Blanca

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of telehealth interventions, such as the remote monitoring of patient clinical data (e.g. blood pressure, blood glucose, heart rate, medication use), has been proposed as a strategy to better manage chronic conditions and to reduce the impact on patients and healthcare systems. The use of algorithms for data acquisition, analysis, transmission, communication and visualisation are now common in remote patient monitoring. However, their use and impact on chronic disease management has not been systematically investigated.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the use, impact, and performance of remote monitoring algorithms across various types of chronic conditions.

METHODS

A literature search of MEDLINE complete, CINHAL complete, and EMBASE was performed using search terms relating to the concepts of remote monitoring, chronic conditions, and data processing algorithms. Comparable outcomes from studies describing the impact on process measures and clinical and patient-reported outcomes were pooled for a summary effect and meta-analyses. A comparison of studies reporting the predictive performance of algorithms was also conducted using the Youden Index.

RESULTS

A total of 89 articles were included in the review. There was no evidence of a positive impact on healthcare utilisation [OR 1.09 (0.90 to 1.31); P=.35] and mortality [OR 0.83 (0.63 to 1.10); P=.208], but there was a positive effect on generic health status [SDM 0.29 (0.06 to 0.51); P=.010] and diabetes control [SDM -0.53 (-0.74 to -0.33); P<.001; I2 = 15.71] (with two of the three diabetes studies being identified as having a high risk of bias). While the majority of impact studies made use of heuristic threshold-based algorithms (n=27 ,87%), most performance studies (n=36, 62%) analysed non-sequential machine learning methods. There was considerable variance in the quality, sample size and performance amongst these studies. Overall, algorithms involved in diagnosis (n=22, 47%) had superior performance to those involved in predicting a future event (n=25, 53%). Detection of arrythmia and ischaemia utilising ECG data showed particularly promising results.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of data processing algorithms involved with the diagnosis of a current condition, particularly those related to the detection of arrythmia and ischaemia, is promising. However, there appears to minimal testing in experimental studies, with only two included impact studies citing a performance study as support for the intervention algorithm used. Thus, there is currently limited evidence of the effect of integrating advanced inference algorithms in remote monitoring interventions.

CLINICALTRIAL

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3