Inlife, an online social support intervention for caregivers of people with dementia: effect evaluation and lessons learned in a randomised controlled trial (Preprint)

Author:

Christie HannahORCID,Dam Alieske Elisabeth Henrike,van Boxtel Martin Petrus JohannesORCID,Köhler SebastianORCID,Verhey Frans Rochus JosefORCID,de Vugt Marjolein ElisabethORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Informal care for persons with dementia (PwD) does not only affect the wellbeing of the primary caregiver, but it also changes their roles and interactions with the social environment. New online interventions might facilitate access to social support. Recently, an online social support platform, Inlife, was developed in the Netherlands aiming to enhance social support and positive interactions in informal support networks.

OBJECTIVE

The current study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Inlife for caregivers of PwD.

METHODS

A randomised controlled trial with 96 caregivers of PwD was performed. Participants were randomly assigned to the Inlife intervention or the waiting-list control group. After 16-weeks of Inlife usage, the waiting-list control group could start using Inlife. Effects were evaluated at baseline (T0), 8-weeks (T1), and 16-weeks (T2). The 16-week follow-up assessment (T2) served as the primary endpoint to evaluate the results for the primary and secondary outcome variables evaluated with online self-report questionnaires. The primary outcomes included feelings of caregiver competence and perceived social support. The secondary outcomes included received support, feelings of loneliness, psychological complaints (e.g., anxiety, stress), and quality of life.

RESULTS

No significant improvements were demonstrated for the intervention group relative to the control group on primary and secondary outcome measures. This contrasts with our qualitative findings showing the potential of Inlife to facilitate the care process in daily life. Adherence was not optimal for all Inlife users. Additional per protocol and sensitivity analysis also revealed no beneficial results for high active Inlife users or specific subgroups. Inlife users were more active when they had a larger network.

CONCLUSIONS

Researchers should be modest regarding the effectiveness of online caregiver interventions in terms of quantitative measures of well-being and quality of life. Nevertheless, online tools have the potential to facilitate the caregiver process in daily life. Lessons learned include the importance of harnessing the power of human interaction in eHealth and make use of the user’s social capital, and the need to develop research methods that can identify benefits in daily life that are ecologically valid for caregivers.

CLINICALTRIAL

Dutch trial register NTR6131, Registered on 20 October 2016.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT

RR2-https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2097-y

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3