Conclusion

Author:

Rudy Kathryn M.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of St Andrews

Abstract

The final chapter considers the social significance of book handling in medieval manuscripts, highlighting models of gesture transmission that fostered social bonds. These models include ritualistic actions required by religious scripts, behaviors modeled by authorities, and behaviors shaped by figures such as teachers. These are all vertical forms of behavior transmission. Horizontal forms include haptic habits that transfer across contexts (at a macro level), and members of peer groups who emulate each other’s behavior (at a micro level). Finally, some interactions are dictated by the physical demands of the book object itself. The study has emphasized the physicality of medieval book interaction, where filling in blanks or adding inscriptions was not just a clerical task but a socially binding act, connecting the past with the future through living continuity. The text investigates the ritualized nature of book handling, with authority figures modeling book interaction that trickled down through social hierarchies, becoming embedded in various rituals and thereby spreading to broader lay and religious communities. A manuscript's marks of wear provide historical evidence of its use, supporting the argument that certain gestures, like touching book initials, had social and performative roles, enhancing the experiential aspect of reading and group participation. The chapter posits that touching an initial could signify the initiation of reading, veneration, or a demonstration to an audience. It proposes that these gestures, while evolving over time and contexts, have left enduring marks on the physical and cultural fabric of book history. In the afterword, the author invites alternate interpretations and evidence, aiming to deepen the understanding of medieval manuscript reception and user interaction. The legacy of these book-touching behaviors persists in contemporary rituals, such as oath-taking, albeit with modern adaptations reflecting current societal norms and knowledge, such as hygiene concerns or secular values.

Publisher

Open Book Publishers

Reference178 articles.

1. Alexander, J. J. G. (Jonathan James Graham), Medieval Illuminators and Their Methods of Work (Yale University Press, 1992).

2. Alexander, J. J. G. (Jonathan James Graham), “Facsimiles, Copies, and Variations: The Relationship to the Model in Medieval and Renaissance European Illuminated Manuscripts,” Studies in the History of Art, 20 (1989), pp. 61–72.

3. Areford, David S., The Viewer and the Printed Image in Late Medieval Europe, Visual Culture in Early Modernity (Routledge, 2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315084961

4. Austin, J. L., How to Do Things with Words. The William James Lectures (Clarendon Press, 1962).

5. Balace, Sophie, and Alexandra De Poorter, Tussen hemel en hel: sterven in de middeleeuwen, 600–1600, exh. cat. Brussels, Koninklijke Musea voor Kunst en Geschiedenis (Mercatorfonds, 2010).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3