College of American Pathologists Considerations for the Delineation of Pathology Clinical Privileges

Author:

Catalano Jr Edward W.1,Ruby Stephen Gerard1,Talbert Michael L.1,Knapman Douglas G.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Pathology, Palmetto Richland Memorial Hospital, Columbia, South Carolina (Dr Catalano); the Department of Pathology, Palos Community Hospital, Palos Heights, Illinois (Dr Ruby); the Department of Pathology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City (Dr Talbert); and Membership and Professional Development Division, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Mr Knap

Abstract

Abstract Context.—The Joint Commission (JC) established new medical staff privileging requirements effective January 2008. The new requirements include the development of ongoing professional practice evaluation (OPPE) and focused professional practice evaluation (FPPE) processes and incorporate the general competencies of patient care, medical knowledge, practice-based learning and improvement, interpersonal and communication skills, professionalism and systems-based practice jointly developed by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS). The College of American Pathologists makes resources available to assist members and their facilities in implementing the new requirements and improving patient care. Objectives.—To review the general requirements for privileging and identify how they may apply to pathologists, to identify currently available activities and metrics that may be useful in addressing these requirements, and to present identified concepts, activities, and metrics for consideration by pathologists and hospitals for their adaptation into the policies and procedures that address the new JC physician privileging requirements. Design.—Review available pathology privileging documentation that addressed the previous JC requirements, review the new requirements, and search for and review available and applicable resources, activities, and metrics. Results.—Common pathology activities and metrics can be incorporated into the privileging processes. Current and new activities and metrics can be incorporated or developed to address the 6 ACGME/ABMS “General Competencies.” Conclusion.—Each hospital has unique privileging and physician evaluation requirements. Providing concepts, activities, and metrics for pathologists and hospitals to consider in pathology privileging will help implement the OPPE and FPPE processes and meet medical staff privileging requirements.

Publisher

Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Subject

Medical Laboratory Technology,General Medicine,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Clinical pathology resident education during the COVID-19 pandemic;Journal of Clinical Pathology;2020-12-14

2. Assessing Physician Competency;Advances in Anatomic Pathology;2012-11

3. American society for apheresis white paper: Considerations for medical staff apheresis medicine physician credentialing and privileging;Journal of Clinical Apheresis;2012

4. Role of Accreditation Procedures in Maintaining Quality;Quality Assurance in the Pathology Laboratory;2011-02-28

5. Professional Quality Assurance in Laboratory Medicine;American Journal of Clinical Pathology;2010-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3