SPOT/Dx Pilot Reanalysis and College of American Pathologists Proficiency Testing for KRAS and NRAS Demonstrate Excellent Laboratory Performance

Author:

Zehir Ahmet1,Nardi Valentina2,Konnick Eric Q.3,Lockwood Christina M.3,Long Thomas A.4,Sidiropoulos Nikoletta5,Souers Rhona J.4,Vasalos Patricia6,Lindeman Neal I.7,Moncur Joel T.8

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Zehir)

2. the Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Nardi)

3. the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle (Konnick, Lockwood)

4. Biostatistics (Long, Souers) Departments, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois

5. Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Vermont Medical Center, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington (Sidiropoulos)

6. Proficiency Testing (Vasalos) Departments, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois

7. the Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York (Lindeman)

8. the Office of the Director, The Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Maryland (Moncur)

Abstract

Context.— The Sustainable Predictive Oncology Therapeutics and Diagnostics quality assurance pilot study (SPOT/Dx pilot) on molecular oncology next-generation sequencing (NGS) reportedly demonstrated performance limitations of NGS laboratory-developed tests, including discrepancies with a US Food and Drug Administration–approved companion diagnostic. The SPOT/Dx pilot methods differ from those used in proficiency testing (PT) programs. Objective.— To reanalyze SPOT/Dx pilot data using PT program methods and compare to PT program data. Also see p. 136. Design.— The College of American Pathologists (CAP) Molecular Oncology Committee reanalyzed SPOT/Dx pilot data applying PT program methods, adjusting for confounding conditions, and compared them to CAP NGS PT program performance (2019–2022). Results.— Overall detection rates of KRAS and NRAS single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and multinucleotide variants (MNVs) by SPOT/Dx pilot laboratories were 96.8% (716 of 740) and 81.1% (129 of 159), respectively. In CAP PT programs, the overall detection rates for the same SNVs and MNVs were 97.2% (2671 of 2748) and 91.8% (1853 of 2019), respectively. In 2022, the overall detection rate for 5 KRAS and NRAS MNVs in CAP PT programs was 97.3% (1161 of 1193). Conclusions.— CAP PT program data demonstrate that laboratories consistently have high detection rates for KRAS and NRAS variants. The SPOT/Dx pilot has multiple design and analytic differences with established PT programs. Reanalyzed pilot data that adjust for confounding conditions demonstrate that laboratories proficiently detect SNVs and less successfully detect rare to never-observed MNVs. The SPOT/Dx pilot results are not generalizable to all molecular oncology testing and should not be used to market products or change policy affecting all molecular oncology testing.

Publisher

Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Subject

Medical Laboratory Technology,General Medicine,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference19 articles.

1. Tapestry Networks. SPOT/Dx Working Group project Web site. https://www.tapestrynetworks.com/our-work/healthcare/spotdx-working-group. Accessed August 19, 2023.

2. Reference samples to compare next-generation sequencing test performance for oncology therapeutics and diagnostics;Pfeifer;Am J Clin Pathol,2022

3. Four-year laboratory performance of the first College of American Pathologists in silico next-generation sequencing bioinformatics proficiency testing surveys;Furtado;Arch Pathol Lab Med,2023

4. Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-102/pdf/STATUTE-102-Pg2903.pdf. Accessed March 3, 2023.

5. AACR Project GENIE: powering precision medicine through an international consortium;AACR Project GENIE Consortium;Cancer Discov,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3