Abstract
An important contemporary version of Boltzmannian statistical mechanics explains the approach to equilibrium in terms of typicality. The problem with this approach is that it comes in different versions, which are, however, not recognized as such and not clearly distinguished. This article identifies three different versions of typicality-based explanations of thermodynamic-like behavior and evaluates their respective successes. The conclusion is that the first two are unsuccessful because they fail to take the system's dynamics into account. The third, however, is promising. I give a precise formulation of the proposal and present an argument in support of its central contention.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy,History
Reference24 articles.
1. Macroscopic Laws, Microscopic Dynamics, Time's Arrow and Boltzmann's Entropy;Lebowitz;Macroscopic Laws, Microscopic Dynamics, Time's Arrow and Boltzmann's Entropy,1993b
2. Physics and Chance
3. Boltzmann and Gibbs: An Attempted Reconciliation;Lavis;Boltzmann and Gibbs: An Attempted Reconciliation,2005
4. Boltzmann's Entropy and Time's Arrow
5. COMPENDIUM OF THE FOUNDATIONS OF CLASSICAL STATISTICAL PHYSICS
Cited by
43 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献