Affiliation:
1. Westermo Network Technologies AB, Västerås, Sweden
2. Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden
Abstract
The quality of embedded systems is demonstrated by the performed tests. The quality of such tests is often dependent on the quality of one or more testing tools, especially in automated testing. Test automation is also central to the success of agile development. It is thus critical to ensure the quality of testing tools. This work explores how industries with agile processes can learn from safety-critical system development with regards to the quality assurance of the test framework development. Safety-critical systems typically need adherence to safety standards that often suggests substantial upfront documentation, plans and a long-term perspective on several development aspects. In contrast, agile approaches focus on quick adaptation, evolving software and incremental deliveries. This article identifies several approaches of quality assurance of software development tools in functional safety development and agile development. The extracted approaches are further analyzed and processed into candidate solutions, i.e., principles and practices for the test framework quality assurance applicable in an industrial context. An industrial focus group with experienced practitioners further validated the candidate solutions through moderated group discussions. The two main contributions from this study are: (i) 48 approaches and 25 derived candidate solutions for test framework quality assurance in four categories (development, analysis, run-time measures, and validation and verification) with related insights, e.g., a test framework should be perceived as a tool-chain and not a single tool, (ii) the perceived value of the candidate solutions in industry as collected from the focus group.
Funder
Westermo Network Technologies AB, the Knowledge Foundation grant
The European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
Reference68 articles.
1. Risks related to the use of software tools when developing cyber-physical systems: a critical perspective on the future of developing complex, safety-critical systems;Asplund;PhD thesis,2014
2. The future of software tool chain safety qualification;Asplund;Safety Science,2015
3. Qualifying software tools, a systems approach;Asplund,2012
4. Balancing agility and discipline: evaluating and integrating agile and plan-driven methods;Boehm,2004
5. The case for context-driven software engineering research: generalizability is overrated;Briand;IEEE Software,2017
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献