Differences in family functioning before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: an observational study in Peruvian families

Author:

Bazo-Alvarez Juan Carlos12,Villarreal-Zegarra David3ORCID,Lázaro-Illatopa Wilder Iván3,Manrique-Millones Denisse4,Ipanaqué-Zapata Miguel56,Garcia María José1,Bazo-Alvarez Oscar7,Goicochea-Ríos Evelyn1,Valle-Salvatierra Willy8,García-Serna Jackeline Edith3

Affiliation:

1. Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Cesar Vallejo, Trujillo, Peru

2. Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom

3. Instituto Peruano de Orientación Psicológica, Lima, Peru

4. Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru

5. Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru

6. PSYCOPERU Peruvian Research Institute of Educational and Social Psychology, Lima, Peru

7. Universidad San Juan Bautista, Lima, Peru

8. Universidad Católica Los Angeles de Chimbote, Chimbote, Peru

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact on family relationships, as several families have lost family members due to COVID-19 pandemic and become physically and emotionally estranged due to lockdown measures and critically economic periods. Our study contrasted two hypotheses: (1) family functioning changed notably before and after the COVID-19 pandemic initiation in terms of cohesion, flexibility, communication and satisfaction; (2) balanced families have a greater capacity to strictly comply with quarantine (i.e., social confinement), compared to unbalanced families. We performed an observational study comparing family functioning between two independent groups, evaluated before and during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Peru. A total of 7,980 participants were included in the study. For the first hypothesis, we found that, during the pandemic, families became more balanced in terms of cohesion (adjusted before-during mean difference or β1= 1.4; 95% CI [1.0–1.7]) and flexibility (β2= 2.0; 95% CI [1.6–2.4]), and families were less disengaged (β3= −1.9; 95% CI [−2.3 to −1.5]) and chaotic (β4= −2.9; 95% CI [−3.3 to −2.4]). Regarding the second hypothesis, we confirmed that families with balanced cohesion (adjusted prevalence ratio or aPR = 1.16; 95% CI [1.12–1.19) and flexibility (aPR = 1.23; 95% CI [1.18–1.27]) allowed greater compliance with quarantine restrictions; while disengaged (aPR = 0.91; 95% CI [0.88–0.93]) and chaotic families (aPR = 0.89; 95% CI [0.87–0.92]) were more likely to partially comply or not comply with the quarantine. Finally, family communication (aPR = 1.17; 95% CI [1.11–1.24]) and satisfaction (aPR = 1.18; 95% CI [1.11–1.25]) also played a role in favouring quarantine compliance. This new evidence enlightens the family systems theory while informing future interventions for improving compliance with quarantine measures in the context of social confinement.

Publisher

PeerJ

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Reference49 articles.

1. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio;Barros;BMC Medical Research Methodology,2003

2. Psychometric properties of the third version of family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales (faces-III): a study of Peruvian adolescents | Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de funcionalidad familiar faces-III: un estudio en adolescentes peruanos;Bazo-Alvarez;Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública,2016

3. Addressing the mental health impact of COVID-19 through population health;Boden;Clinical Psychology Review,2021

4. Alarming trends in US domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic;Boserup;The American Journal of Emergency Medicine,2020

5. COVID-19 pandemic and social distancing: economic, psychological, family, and technological effects;Both;Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3