Modern approaches to choosing the method of regional anesthesia during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Author:

Ivanishcheva Yu. A.1,Zaytsev A. Yu.2ORCID,Kavochkin A. A.3,Kabakov D. G.3,Vyzhigina M. A.4,Dubrovin K. V.5ORCID,Bazarov D. V.6

Affiliation:

1. B. N. Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery

2. Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery; I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

3. B. N. Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

4. B. V. Petrovsky National Research Center of Surger

5. B. V. Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery; I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

6. B. V. Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery

Abstract

The objective was to analyze the literature on modern approaches to the choice of regional anesthesia method for thoracoscopic surgical interventions. Materials and methods. A review of the most common approaches to the choice of regional anesthesia method for thoracoscopic surgical interventions was carried out.Results. The analysis of the literature has shown that to date, in the practice of an anesthesiologist and intensivist, there is no single standard for anesthesia of patients during and after thoracoscopic operations, but the use of regional anesthesia methods can increase the positive effects of minimally invasive methods, which include video-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries (VATS). Further studies comparing the efficacy of regional anesthesia methods in thoracic surgery are needed.Conclusion. At the moment, the evidence collected in the world specialized literature confirms that thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), paravertebral block, erector spinae plane block, and serratus anterior plane block can be considered comparatively effective methods of regional anesthesia in VATS. Meanwhile, high-quality comparative clinical studies that allow us to choose the most effective and safe method of regional anesthesia are limited.

Publisher

FSBEI HE I.P. Pavlov SPbSMU MOH Russia

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3