Evaluation systems and approaches towards analyzing the impact of the results of scientific research upon the economy and society: international experience

Author:

Popova Svetlana Mikhailovna,Yanik Andrey Aleksandrovich

Abstract

Systematic evaluation of the results of research activity funded by the state, including analysis of the impact of the results of research upon the development of the economy and society, has become common practice in governance of the science sector. It pertains to acquisition of evidence-based data and feedback necessary for decision making on the effectiveness of the existing governance techniques and selection of the methods (including legal) for their improvement. The exceptional complexity and dynamic change of the object of analysis (science, production of scientific knowledge) encourages to constantly search for new approaches worldwide for acquiring qualitative and accurate evaluations of the results of scientific research. From such perspective, systematic monitoring and analysis of the relevant foreign experience is advantageous for the theory and practice of governing scientific development, as it allows taking into account the mistakes and achievements of other countries with regards to development and improvement of their evaluation systems. Analysis is conducted on a range of systems (mainly European) and approaches towards evaluation of the contribution of sciences to socioeconomic development. The author reveals the peculiarities and flaws of the evaluation system under study. This article is first to demonstrate that the vast problematic field associated with the assessment of the contribution of sciences, should be viewed within the framework of the theory of state audit, which distinguishes between external and internal systems of monitoring. The conclusion is made that the peculiarities of functionality of science do not allow demarcating the contours of internal and external audit of the results of “scientific production” without compromising the quality of the acquired conclusions. The improvement of evaluation systems is a continuous process, associated with the co-evolution of science and scientific policy.

Publisher

Aurora Group, s.r.o

Reference61 articles.

1. Chernikova I.V. (2011) Tipologiya nauki v kontekste sovremennoi filosofii nauki // Voprosy filosofii. № 11. S. 71-78.

2. Kravets A.S. (1992) Ideologiya nauki // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. № 6. S. 26-28.

3. Higher Education and Research Act 2017 // UK Parliament: Parliamentary Bills. URL: https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/1773 (data obrashcheniya:. 01.11.2021).

4. Stepashin S.V. Konstitutsionnyi audit. M.: Nauka, 2006. - 814 s.

5. Ben-Devid Dzh. Rol' uchenogo v obshchestve / per. s angl. A. Smirnov. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2014. – 344 s.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3