Resting Energy Expenditure Early after Cardiac Surgery and Validity of Predictive Equations: A Prospective Observational Study

Abstract

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> Several predictive equations have been used to estimate patients’ energy expenditure. The study aimed to describe the characteristics of resting energy expenditure (REE) in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation during early postoperative stage after cardiac surgery and evaluate the validity of 9 REE predictive equations. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This was a prospective observational study. Patients aged 18–80 years old, undergone open-heart surgery, were enrolled between January 2017 and 2018. The measured REE (mREE) was evaluated via indirect calorimetry (IC). The predictive resting energy expenditure (pREE) was suggested by 9 predictive equations, including Harris-Benedict (HB), HB coefficient method, Ireton-Jones, Owen, Mifflin, Liu, 25 × body weight (BW), 30 × BW, and 35 × BW. The association between mREE and pREE was assessed by Pearson’s correlation, paired <i>t</i> test, Bland-Altman method, and the limits of agreement (LOA). <b><i>Results:</i></b> mREE was related to gender, BMI, age, and body temperature. mREE was significantly correlated with pREE, as calculated by 9 equations (all <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). There was no significant difference between pREE and mREE, as calculated by 30 × BW kcal/kg/day (<i>t</i> = 0.782, <i>p</i> = 0.435), while significant differences were noted between mREE and pREE calculated by other equations (all <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05). Taking the 30 × BW equation as a suitable candidate, most of the data points were within LOA, and the percentage was 95.6% (129/135). Considering the rationality of clinical use, accurate predictions (%) were calculated, and only 40.74% was acceptable. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The 30 × BW equation is relatively acceptable for estimating REE in 9 predictive equations in the early stage after heart surgery. However, the IC method should be the first choice if it is feasible.