Usefulness of an Intrapartum Ultrasound Simulator (IUSim™) for Midwife Training: Results from an RCT

Author:

di Pasquo Elvira,Ramirez Zegarra RubenORCID,Kiener Ariane J.O.,Gobbi Laura,Dall’Asta AndreaORCID,Fieschi Laura,Cugini Lodovica,Copelli Monica,Frusca Tiziana,Ghi TullioORCID

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> We conducted a randomized study to determine whether a training session on a dedicated simulator (IUSim™) would facilitate the midwives in learning the technique of transperineal intrapartum ultrasound. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Following a 30-min multimedia presentation including images and videos on how to obtain and measure the angle of progression (AoP) and the head-perineum distance (HPD), 6 midwives with no prior experience in intrapartum ultrasound were randomly split into 2 groups: 3 of them were assigned to the “training group” and 3 to the “control group.” The midwives belonging to the former group were taught to measure the 2 sonographic parameters during a 3-h practical session conducted on IUSim™ under the supervision of an expert obstetrician. In the following 3 months, all the 6 midwives were asked to independently perform transperineal ultrasound during their clinical practice and to measure on the acquired images either the AoP or the HPD. The sonographic images were examined in blind by the teaching obstetrician who assigned a 0–3 score to the image quality (IQS) and to the measurement quality (MQS). <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 48 ultrasound images (24 patients) from 5 midwives were acquired and included in the study analysis. A midwife of the “training group” declined participation after the practical session. Independently from the randomization group, the image quality score (IQS + MQS) was significantly higher for the HPD compared with the AoP (2.5 ± 0.66 vs. 1.79 ± 1.14; <i>p</i> = 0.01). In the training group, the MQS of either AoP (2.66 ± 0.5 vs.1.46 ± 1.45. <i>p</i> = 0.038) and the HPD (2.9 ± 0.33 vs. 1.87 ± 0.83 <i>p</i> = 0.002) was significantly higher in comparison with the control group, while the IQS of both measurements was comparable between the 2 groups (1.91 ± 1.24 vs. 2.25 ± 0.865; <i>p</i> = 0.28). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The use of a dedicated simulator may facilitate the midwives in learning how to measure the AoP and the HPD on transperineal ultrasound images.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Embryology,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference29 articles.

1. Ghi T, Eggebø T, Lees C, Kalache K, Rozenberg P, Youssef A, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(1):128–39.

2. Tutschek B, Braun T, Chantraine F, Henrich W. A study of progress of labour using intrapartum translabial ultrasound, assessing head station, direction, and angle of descent. BJOG. 2011;118(1):62–9.

3. Eggebø TM, Wilhelm-Benartzi C, Hassan WA, Usman S, Salvesen KA, Lees CC. A model to predict vaginal delivery in nulliparous women based on maternal characteristics and intrapartum ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(3):362–6.

4. Hassan WA, Eggebø T, Ferguson M, Gillett A, Studd J, Pasupathy D, et al. The sonopartogram: a novel method for recording progress of labor by ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43(2):189–94.

5. Barbera AF, Pombar X, Perugino G, Lezotte DC, Hobbins JC. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(3):313–9.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Intrapartum Ultrasonographic Simulation in Dystocic Labor;Practical Guide to Simulation in Delivery Room Emergencies;2023

2. Labor Simulations: “Hard Drill Makes an Easy Battle”;Practical Guide to Simulation in Delivery Room Emergencies;2023

3. Present and future of ultrasound in labor;American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM;2022-07

4. Is it time for midwives to do intrapartum ultrasound in the delivery ward?;The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine;2022-03-06

5. Repérage échographique du fœtus: évaluation prospective de l’impact d’un dispositif de formation continue des sages-femmes sur l’organisation des soins en salle de naissance;Pédagogie Médicale;2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3