Utility of the Angle between the Right Aortic Arch and First Branch for Detecting Double Aortic Arch via Fetal Echocardiography

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The presence of a double aortic arch (DAA) is manifested by compressive symptoms, requiring surgery. DAA cases are classified as either complete or incomplete type. DAA and a right aortic arch with mirror image branching (mRAA) have a similar configuration to the first branch artery. The first branch of the mRAA is the left brachiocephalic artery, which appears to be the same as that of an incomplete DAA due to blood flow interruption. The present retrospective study aimed to evaluate the differences between DAA and mRAA by fetal echocardiography. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This single retrospective cohort study included all patients diagnosed with complete DAA, incomplete DAA, or mRAA at our facility between 2010 and 2022. The patients were diagnosed with complete DAA, incomplete DAA, or mRAA after birth and remaining fetal echocardiograms. The patients were divided into the DAA (complete DAA: <i>n</i> = 4, incomplete DAA: <i>n</i> = 3) and mRAA (<i>n</i> = 4) groups. The following three outcomes were compared: (1) angle between the right aortic arch and first branch (RF angle), (2) ratio of height to width of the region bounded by the aortic arch, first branch of the aortic arch, and descending aorta, and (3) maximum tracheal diameter on a three-vessel trachea view. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The incomplete DAA cases were difficult to diagnose via fetal echocardiography. On fetal echocardiography, the RF angle was significantly steeper in the DAA group than in the mRAA group (median 57° [36°–69°] vs. 75° [62°–94°]; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The DAA and RAA groups showed no significant differences in the ratio of height to width of the region bounded by the aortic arch, first branch of the aortic arch, and descending aorta (median 0.57 [0.17–0.68] vs. 0.73 [0.56–1.0]) and maximum tracheal diameter (median 2.5 [1.4–3.3] vs. 3.2 [2.8–3.5] mm). The cut-off value for the presence of DAA was an RF angle &lt;71°. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The DAA group (complete and incomplete DAA) had a significantly steeper RF angle than the mRAA group. Therefore, RF angle measurement could improve the fetal diagnosis and postnatal prognosis of DAA.