Ten-Year Review of Major Birth Defects in VLBW Infants

Author:

Adams-Chapman Ira1,Hansen Nellie I.2,Shankaran Seetha3,Bell Edward F.4,Boghossian Nansi S.4,Murray Jeffrey C.4,Laptook Abbot R.5,Walsh Michele C.6,Carlo Waldemar A.7,Sánchez Pablo J.8,Van Meurs Krisa P.9,Das Abhik10,Hale Ellen C.1,Newman Nancy S.6,Ball M. Bethany8,Higgins Rosemary D.11,Stoll Barbara J.1,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, and Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia;

2. Social, Statistical and Environmental Sciences Unit, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;

3. Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan;

4. Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa;

5. Department of Pediatrics, Women & Infants’ Hospital, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island;

6. Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies & Children’s Hospital, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio;

7. Division of Neonatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama;

8. Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas;

9. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Palo Alto, California;

10. Social, Statistical and Environmental Sciences Unit, RTI International, Rockville, Maryland; and

11. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Birth defects (BDs) are an important cause of infant mortality and disproportionately occur among low birth weight infants. We determined the prevalence of BDs in a cohort of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants cared for at the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network (NRN) centers over a 10-year period and examined the relationship between anomalies, neonatal outcomes, and surgical care. METHODS: Infant and maternal data were collected prospectively for infants weighing 401 to 1500 g at NRN sites between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2007. Poisson regression models were used to compare risk of outcomes for infants with versus without BDs while adjusting for gestational age and other characteristics. RESULTS: A BD was present in 1776 (4.8%) of the 37 262 infants in our VLBW cohort. Yearly prevalence of BDs increased from 4.0% of infants born in 1998 to 5.6% in 2007, P < .001. Mean gestational age overall was 28 weeks, and mean birth weight was 1007 g. Infants with BDs were more mature but more likely to be small for gestational age compared with infants without BDs. Chromosomal and cardiovascular anomalies were most frequent with each occurring in 20% of affected infants. Mortality was higher among infants with BDs (49% vs 18%; adjusted relative risk: 3.66 [95% confidence interval: 3.41–3.92]; P < .001) and varied by diagnosis. Among those surviving >3 days, more infants with BDs underwent major surgery (48% vs 13%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of BDs increased during the 10 years studied. BDs remain an important cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality among VLBW infants.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference23 articles.

1. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2009.;Kochanek;Pediatrics,2012

2. Infant mortality from congenital malformations in the United States, 1970-1997.;Lee;Obstet Gynecol,2001

3. Teratology: from science to birth defects prevention.;Rasmussen;Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol,2009

4. Birth defects and preterm birth: overlapping outcomes with a shared strategy for research and prevention.;Dolan;Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol,2009

5. Racial differences by gestational age in neonatal deaths attributable to congenital heart defects --- United States, 2003-2006.;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC);MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep,2010

Cited by 26 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3