Drivers of Inpatient Subspecialty Consultation Among Pediatric Hospitalists: A Qualitative Study

Author:

Kern-Goldberger Andrew S.123,Bracy Danny4,Szymczak Julia E.56,Gonzalez Denise4,Rothberg Michael B.23,Gerber Jeffrey S.578,Bonafide Christopher P.58910

Affiliation:

1. aDivision of Pediatric Hospital Medicine

2. bCenter for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

3. cCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

4. dMixed-Methods Research Laboratory, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

5. eClinical Futures, a Center of Emphasis within the CHOP Research Institute

6. fDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah

7. gDivision of Infectious Diseases

8. hDepartment of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine

9. iSection of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

10. jPenn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (PISCE@LDI), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Inpatient subspecialty consultation is often medically necessary but in some cases may represent overuse. While pediatric consultation patterns have been described using observational data, qualitative methods may generate knowledge about contextual determinants of consultation behavior. Our objective was to understand how pediatric hospitalists make decisions about subspecialty consultation. METHODS This qualitative study took place at a large academic children’s hospital as part of an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design (QUAN → qual). We conducted semistructured interviews with a purposive sample of previously identified high-consulting (top quartile) and low-consulting (bottom quartile) pediatric hospitalists. Interviews were conducted virtually, and audio recordings were transcribed. Two analysts coded transcripts using an integrated approach and established high interrater reliability (κ > 0.75). We organized findings using the Social Ecological Model. RESULTS Participants (n = 12) included high-(n = 6) and low-(n = 6) consulting hospitalists. Our respondents identified considerations including patient characteristics, confidence in their own competence and that of their team, and perceived helpfulness of consultants. Participants viewed consultation requests as being strongly influenced by a desire to maintain relationships with families. Specific to this context, the hospital’s elite reputation was believed to influence families to expect consultations. Other considerations included medicolegal risk, clinical pathways, and availability of secure text messaging to facilitate informal “curbside” conversations with subspecialists. CONCLUSIONS Decision-making around pediatric subspecialty consultation is complex and influenced by factors unrelated to a patient’s clinical need. Efforts to reduce low-value consultation must account for the social and organizational dynamics that promote consultation.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3