Emergency Department Evaluation of Young Infants With Head Injury

Author:

Lyons Todd W.12,Mannix Rebekah12,Monuteaux Michael C.32,Schutzman Sara A.12

Affiliation:

1. aDepartments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine

2. cDivision of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

3. bDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

OBJECTIVES We compared the emergency department (ED) evaluation and outcomes of young head-injured infants to older children. METHODS Using the Pediatric Health Information Systems database, we performed a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of children <2 years old with isolated head injuries (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, diagnoses) at one of 47 EDs from 2015 to 2019. Our primary outcome was utilization of diagnostic cranial imaging. Secondary outcomes were diagnosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI), clinically important TBI, and mortality. We compared outcomes between the youngest infants (<3 months old) and children 3 to 24 months old. RESULTS We identified 112 885 ED visits for children <2 years old with isolated head injuries. A total of 62 129 (55%) were by males, and 10 325 (9.1%) were by infants <3 months of age. Compared with older children (12–23 months old), the youngest infants were more likely to: Undergo any diagnostic cranial imaging (50.3% vs 18.3%; difference 31.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 35.0–28.9%), be diagnosed with a TBI (17.5% vs 2.7%; difference 14.8%, 95% CI 16.4%–13.2%) or clinically important TBI (4.6% vs 0.5%; difference 4.1%, 95% CI 3.8%–4.5%), and to die (0.3% vs 0.1%; difference 0.2%, 95% CI 0.3%–0.1%). Among those undergoing computed tomography or MRI, TBIs were significantly more common in the youngest infants (26.4% vs 8.8%, difference 17.6%, 95% CI 16.3%–19.0%). CONCLUSIONS The youngest infants with head injuries are significantly more likely to undergo cranial imaging, be diagnosed with brain injuries, and die, highlighting the need for a specialized approach for this vulnerable population.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3