Affiliation:
1. Audiology and Deafness Research Group, School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness in routine practice of the first phase of a national population-based newborn hearing screening and follow-up program that seeks to identify infants with bilateral permanent hearing loss of ≥40-dB hearing loss.
METHODS. The study was a part of the independent evaluation of the 23 first phase sites (annual birth population ∼120000) of the national newborn hearing screening program in England. For each infant identified with the defined hearing loss, the measures of interest were degree and type of hearing loss, presence of risk factors, age of first audiologic assessment, age of identification of hearing loss, age of enrollment in an early support program, and age of hearing aid fitting. Data collection took place over the first 2 years of the program.
RESULTS. Data were provided on 169 infants with permanent bilateral moderate or greater hearing loss identified through screening 169487 infants. Fifty-four percent of all cases were from an “at-risk” population. Three fourths of these “at-risk” infants spent ≥48 hours in the NICU. For the whole sample, the median age at first audiologic assessment was 5 weeks; the median age of identification of the hearing loss and of enrollment in early support program was 10 weeks irrespective of the degree of hearing loss; and the median age at hearing aid fitting was 16 weeks. Infants with moderate hearing loss were fitted with hearing aids significantly later than those with severe and profound hearing loss.
CONCLUSIONS. Properly implemented, a newborn hearing screening program based on whole populations and routine service provision can deliver satisfactory outcomes in terms of age of referral, identification, and intervention. The distribution of degree and type of hearing loss and proportion with risk factors was similar to that expected. The numbers identified were such as to suggest that very few cases were missed by the screening program.
Publisher
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Reference20 articles.
1. Fortnum HM, Summerfield AQ, Marshall DH, Davis AC, Bamford JM. Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment in the United Kingdom and implications for universal neonatal hearing screening: questionnaire based ascertainment study. BMJ. 2001;323:536–539
2. Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Coulter DK, Mehl AL. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics. 1998;102:1161–1171
3. Thompson DC, McPhillips H, Davis R, Lieu T, Homer C, Helfand M. Universal Newborn Hearing Screening. Summary of evidence. JAMA. 2001;286:2000–2010
4. Hyde ML. Evidence-based practice, ethics and EHDI program quality. In: Seewald RC, Bamford J, eds. A Sound Foundation Through Early Amplification (Proceedings of the 3rd International Pediatric Conference). Basel, Switzerland: Phonak AG; 2005
5. Fortnum H, Davis A. Epidemiology of permanent hearing impairment in Trent region, 1985–1993. Br J Audiol. 1997;31:409–446
Cited by
77 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献