Antenatal Counseling Regarding Resuscitation at an Extremely Low Gestational Age

Author:

Batton Daniel G.,

Abstract

The anticipated delivery of an extremely low gestational age infant raises difficult questions for all involved, including whether to initiate resuscitation after delivery. Each institution caring for women at risk of delivering extremely preterm infants should provide comprehensive and consistent guidelines for antenatal counseling. Parents should be provided the most accurate prognosis possible on the basis of all the factors known to affect outcome for a particular case. Although it is not feasible to have specific criteria for when the initiation of resuscitation should or should not be offered, the following general guidelines are suggested. If the physicians involved believe there is no chance for survival, resuscitation is not indicated and should not be initiated. When a good outcome is considered very unlikely, the parents should be given the choice of whether resuscitation should be initiated, and clinicians should respect their preference. Finally, if a good outcome is considered reasonably likely, clinicians should initiate resuscitation and, together with the parents, continually reevaluate whether intensive care should be continued. Whenever resuscitation is considered an option, a qualified individual, preferably a neonatologist, should be involved and should be present in the delivery room to manage this complex situation. Comfort care should be provided for all infants for whom resuscitation is not initiated or is not successful.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference53 articles.

1. MacDonald H; American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics. 2002;110(5):1024–1027

2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin No. 38: perinatal care at the threshold of viability. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;79(2):181–188

3. American Academy of Pediatrics; American Heart Association. Lesson 9: ethics and care at the end of life. In: Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation. 5th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics and American Heart Association; 2006:1–16

4. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Critical Care and Decisions in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine: Ethical Issues. London, England: Nuffield Council on Bioethics; 2006. Available at: www.nuffieldbioethics.org/go/ourwork/neonatal/introduction. Accessed October 26, 2008

5. Peerzada JM, Richardson DK, Burns JP. Delivery room decision-making at the threshold of viability. J Pediatr. 2004;145(4):492–498

Cited by 180 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3