Civil liability for the actions of autonomous AI in healthcare: an invitation to further contemplation

Author:

Eldakak AhmedORCID,Alremeithi Abdulla,Dahiyat EmadORCID,El-Gheriani Moatasem,Mohamed Hassan,Abdulrahim Abdulla Mohammad Ibrahim

Abstract

AbstractThere are already a number of autonomous robots that play a significant role in improving the quality of healthcare in different areas ranging from basic health diagnosis to complex surgeries. However, using robots and machine learning applications in the healthcare context poses concerns over liability for patient injury. This paper will thus attempt to investigate the potential legal problems that might arise if AI technology evolves or is commonly used in clinical practice. It also examines whether the traditional doctrines of liability can adequately address the liability for the injuries stemming from acts of autonomous robots. As such, this paper adopted both descriptive and analytical methodologies to explore the main focus of the study. while the descriptive methodology was used to spot light on various theories of liability, the analytical methodology was used to critically examine the main theories that have been advanced to deal with autonomous robots and predict the necessity of legal reform. Throughout this paper, the authors insist on the importance of distinguishing between robots in light of their degree of autonomy and then drafting liability rules depending on whether the action was done autonomously by an unattended robot or whether it was done automatically by an attended robot. Finally, the paper concludes with the proposal of a series of factors to be considered for the future regulation of AI Robots in the healthcare context.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference42 articles.

1. Allain J (2013) From jeopardy! to Jaundice: the medical liability implications of Dr. Watson and other artificial intelligence systems. La Law Rev 73:1049–1079

2. Bush S (2010) Formation of the physician-patient relationship: the Oregon Court of Appeals clarifies, but questions remain. Phys Org 13:11–13

3. Chan B (2021) Applying a common enterprise theory of liability to clinical AI systems. Am J Law Med 47:351–385. https://doi.org/10.1017/amj.2022.1

4. Clark W et al. (2019) Evaluating the use of robotic and virtual reality rehabilitation technologies to improve function in stroke survivors: a narrative review. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng 6:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2021.100567

5. Cooke BK, Worsham E, Reisfield GM (2017) The elusive standard of care. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 45(3):358–364

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3