Students’ perception of peer teaching in engineering education: a mixed–method case study

Author:

Dosoftei Constantin Cătălin,Alexa Lidia

Abstract

AbstractBackground: Engineering education is constantly evolving and adapting to meet the demand for diverse skills and competencies in graduates, in response to the changing global economy and technological advancements. This requires shifting from a traditional content-oriented and professor-focused approach towards a more interactive, student-centered approach in which students actively engage in all process stages. The study’s main objective was to examine the students’ perceptions of peer teaching and better understand the method’s perceived advantages and disadvantages. The research was conducted over two academic years (2021 and 2022) and involved 96 students. The research incorporated quantitative and qualitative data collected through online questionnaires completed by the students at the end of the semester. The results showed a cumulative positive response rate for all close-ended questions of over 60%. The correlation analysis revealed medium positive relationships among the variables, including self-confidence, academic performance, communication and active listening, teamwork, knowledge consolidation, student-teacher benefits, and teaching activity. The thematic analysis of the open-ended questions showed that 87% of the respondents perceived the peer-teaching experience as positive and valuable. The main advantages listed by students were better communication, practicality, increased attention and interaction, and overcoming student-teacher anxiety. The main disadvantage was the perceived lack of structure and experience in coordinating laboratory work. The study results indicate that peer-based instructional methods can lead to more effective dissemination of knowledge among students, as evidenced by the high percentage of respondents who reported improved comprehension through peer-to-peer explanations. At the same time, the efficacy of this approach is contingent upon the instructor’s preparation and support, which facilitates the learning process and enhances the classroom’s social dynamics.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference52 articles.

1. Al-Badrawy A-N (2017) Role of Engineering Design in Enhancing ABET Outcomes of Engineering Programs at Taif University. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL APPLIED SCIENCE Technology. Vol. 6. 9-15., 39 1:9–14

2. Altintas T, Gunes A, Sayan H (2016) A peer-assisted learning experience in computer programming language learning and developing computer programming skills. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 53:329–337

3. Bene K, Bergus G (2014) When learners become teachers: a review of peer teaching in medical student education. Fam. Medicion. 46(10):783–787

4. Boud, D (2001). Making the move to peer learning. In DC Boud, Peer Learning in Higher Education: Learning from and with each other (pp. 1-20.). London: Kogan Page (now Routledge)

5. Boud D, Cohen R, Sampson J (1999) Peer learning and assessment. Assess. High. Educ. 24:413–426

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3