Abstract
AbstractThe international nature of doctoral education creates interesting tensions where national systems, institutional policies, disciplinary customs, individual supervisor preferences, and doctoral researcher needs meet. The Thesis by Publication (TBP), a model where published works are included within the thesis, is available to doctoral researchers in many disciplines and institutions, but it is not a universally accepted format or approached in a homogeneous way. Policy has been known to shape practice, yet we know little about how institutional policies shape TBP practices across different national contexts. This study presents a content analysis of policy documents related to the TBP in public universities across six countries: Australia, Japan, New Zealand, South Africa, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Our goal is to understand the prevalence of the TBP and related policy documentation in different contexts, and how the model is promoted and positioned within the doctoral landscape. Findings from our study challenge the often-stated notion that the TBP is a universally understood format. Our findings also show the risks in the absence of explicit policies, as well as the possible inequalities that may arise as a result of a lack of policy transparency and synergy within and across contexts.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference45 articles.
1. Browning, L., Thompson, K. and Dawson, D. (2014) Developing future research leaders: designing early career researcher programs to enhance track record. International Journal for Researcher Development 5(2): 123–134
2. Chong, S.W. (2022) Demystifying commentary guidelines of PhD by published work in the UK: Insights from genre analysis. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 59(3): 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1871396
3. Chong, S.W. and Johnson, N.H. (2022) Landscapes and Narratives of PhD by Publication: demystifying students’ and supervisors’ perspectives, Cham: Springer.
4. Cloete, N., Bunting, I. & van Schalkwyk, F. (2022). Analysis of the academic staffing of SA public universities. DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Scientometrics and Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Report. https://www0.sun.ac.za/scistip/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Policy-Dialogues-Staffing-March-2022.pdf
5. Council on Higher Education. (2022). National Review of South African doctoral qualifications 2020-2021. Available online at https://www.che.ac.za/sites/default/files/inline-files/CHE%20Doctoral%20Degrees%20National%20Reporte.pdf
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献