Abstract
Collecting, which is a niche area of consumer behavior, has been given little research attention by marketing scholars. Based on an extensive literature review and primary data collection through in-depth interviews, conducted in Turkey, the present study intends to understand collectors’ motivations and emotional outputs of the process. Additionally, it also aims at classifying collector typologies based on their starting point of collecting and revealing the differentiated motives and emotional outcomes of each typology. The findings indicate that all of the participants in all groups stated that they are addicted to collecting. Within groups, Family collectors differentiate with passion for research and childhood collectors with nostalgia whereas leaving a heritage to the future and self-expression are the main motives of adulthood collectors. On the output side, the pleasure/satisfaction derived from collecting has been the common point of all collector groups. Besides, the percentage of pleasure takers in the A.C. is slightly lower than in other groups. Other positive outputs of collectors are listed as socializing, differentiation, and self-confidence. This typology will bring in more clarity and further insights that will help scholars; expand the research domain and it helps sellers of collectibles.
Publisher
Dogus Universitesi Dergisi
Reference67 articles.
1. Anderson, R. C. (1974). Paintings as an investment. Economic Inquiry, 12, 13–26.
2. Apostolou, M. (2011). Why do men collect things? A case study of fossilized dinosaur eggs. Journal of Economic Psychology,
3. Aramendia, M. E. (2020). Nuclear energy promotion using collectible cards aimed at children. Journal of Historical Research in Marketing, 12(1), 75–100.
4. Baekeland, F. and Pearce, S. (Ed.). (1994). Psychological aspects of art collecting. Interpreting Objects and Collections, 19-205. London: Routledge.
5. Baltas, G. and Giakoumaki, C. (2021). The structure of automotive nostalgia: A hedonic price analysis of classic car model value formation. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, doi:10.1108/JEAS-02-2021-0027