Allergen-specific immunotherapy and real-world evidence

Author:

Timoshenko Daria O.ORCID,Pavlova Ksenia S.ORCID,Kurbacheva Oksana M.ORCID

Abstract

Allergen immunotherapy is the most common method of treating IgE-dependent allergic disorders in clinical practice. Despite the enormous amount of data from randomized placebo-controlled trials on allergen immunotherapy efficacy, a lot of questions regarding the efficacy of allergen immunotherapy in practice remain unanswered. These questions can be answered using real-world evidence. In conducting real-world evidence investigations of allergen immunotherapy, it is necessary to follow a strict methodology and perform a multivariate analysis of the available data. The use of statistical methods reduces the risk of bias. The REACT study, which included more than 90,000 patients with allergic rhinitis from Germany, is currently the largest and the most comprehensive real-world evidence study of allergen immunotherapy. To ensure comparable groups and representative data, a propensity score match statistical adjustment procedure was applied. The REACT study provided results of fundamental clinical and public health significance: the allergen immunotherapy leads to a sustained and long-term reduction in drug prescription in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma, improved control of asthma, and also prevents the development of exacerbations and respiratory infections in asthma patients. The REACT study is a good quality real-world evidence study with strict methodology and representative results. Further high-quality standard studies of real-world data may not only confirm the randomized trial evidence but also may become a source of new evidence of the efficacy and safety of allergen immunotherapy in clinical practice.

Publisher

Farmarus Print Media

Reference18 articles.

1. Federal clinical guidelines for allergen-specific immunotherapy. Moscow: Russian Association of Allergologists and Clinical Immunologists; 2013. 13 p. (In Russ).

2. PROPHYLACTIC INOCULATION AGAINST HAY FEVER

3. Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P, et al. The 2011 Oxford CEBM Levels of Evidence. Available from: https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/ocebm-levels-of-evidence. Accessed: 25.04.2022.

4. Preseasonal Injection Treatment in Hay Fever Using Aqueous Extracts

5. Low dose sublingual therapy in patients with allergic rhinitis due to house dust mite

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3