A systematic review of psychological treatments for women presenting with factitious disorder and factitious disorder imposed on another

Author:

Tooby Georgia,Siddall Yasmin,Clarke Martin

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the psychological treatments for Factitious Disorder (FD) and Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another (FDIA) in women. The literature is limited and consists of case series and case reports. To date there has been no systematic review of the effectiveness of the psychological treatments. This review aims to identify which psychological treatments have been used to treat FD and FDIA, to hypothesise a psychological treatment strategy which can be implemented in clinical practice and evaluated in future research. The objective of this systematic review is to identify and summarise psychological treatments which have been effective when treating FD and FDIA in women.Methods: A total of 543 records were screened, and 29 remaining papers were reviewed. A supplementary search was then conducted using the reference lists of eligible studies. In total 29 eligible studies yielded a sample of 38 cases. Information extracted included study characteristics, type of psychological therapy, co-morbid disorders, other treatment methods, childhood maltreatment, effective and non-effective outcomes, clinical measures and follow up.Results: Our findings offer an important first step towards an evidence-based approach to the disorder. A narrative synthesis was undertaken to describe the characteristics, quality, and outcomes of studies. The narrative synthesis surveyed the state of knowledge and provided an overview and integration of psychological treatments of FD and FDIA in women.Conclusion: This review highlights there is no standardised approach for psychological treatment in FD and FDIA. It is recommended that consistency of care, a good therapeutic relationship, and adoption of a holistic and integrative approach to treatment which is grounded in individualised formulation may be fundamental in achieving effective outcomes. The fi dings provide a basis for several clinical recommendations and a robust first step towards an evidence-based approach for the psychological treatments of FD and FDIA in women.

Publisher

British Psychological Society

Reference70 articles.

1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. American Psychiatric Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

2. Munchausen Syndrome

3. Ayoub, C. (2010). Advancements in diagnosis & co-morbidities in factitious disorder by proxy. In B. Bursch (Chair) Munchausen by Proxy: Forensic Issues. Symposium at the 41st annual meeting.

4. Bartlett, A. (2017). The clinical care of women in secure hospital services. Forensic psychiatry (pp.413–418). CRC Press.

5. Factitious disorders and malingering: challenges for clinical assessment and management;Bass;The Lancet,,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3