Cognitive Effects of Body Temperature During Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest Trial (GOT ICE): A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Outcomes After Aortic Arch Surgery

Author:

Hughes G. Chad1ORCID,Chen Edward P.1ORCID,Browndyke Jeffrey N.2ORCID,Szeto Wilson Y.3,DiMaio J. Michael4ORCID,Brinkman William T.4ORCID,Gaca Jeffrey G.1,Blumenthal James A.2ORCID,Karhausen Jorn A.5ORCID,Bisanar Tiffany5,James Michael L.56ORCID,Yanez David7ORCID,Li Yi-Ju7ORCID,Mathew Joseph P.5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. (G.C.H., E.P.C., J.G.G.)

2. Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Division of Behavioral Medicine & Neurosciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. (J.N.B., J.A.B.)

3. Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (W.Y.S.).

4. The Heart Hospital, Baylor Scott and White, Plano, TX (J.M.D., W.T.B.).

5. Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. (J.A.K., T.B., M.L.J., J.P.M.)

6. Department of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. (M.L.J.)

7. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. (D.Y., Y.-J.L.)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deep hypothermia has been the standard for hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) during aortic arch surgery. However, centers worldwide have shifted toward lesser hypothermia with antegrade cerebral perfusion. This has been supported by retrospective data, but there has yet to be a multicenter, prospective randomized study comparing deep versus moderate hypothermia during HCA. METHODS: This was a randomized single-blind trial (GOT ICE) of patients undergoing arch surgery with HCA plus antegrade cerebral perfusion at 4 US referral aortic centers (August 2016–December 2021). Patients were randomized to 1 of 3 hypothermia groups: DP, deep (≤20.0 °C); LM, low-moderate (20.1–24.0 °C); and HM, high-moderate (24.1–28.0 °C). The primary outcome was composite global cognitive change score between baseline and 4 weeks postoperatively. Intention-to-treat analysis to evaluate if: (1) LM noninferior to DP on global cognitive change score; (2) DP superior to HM. The secondary outcomes were domain-specific cognitive change scores, neuroimaging findings, quality of life, and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients consented; 282 met inclusion and were randomized. A total of 273 completed surgery, and 251 completed the 4-week follow-up (DP, 85 [34%]; LM, 80 [34%]; HM, 86 [34%]). Mean global cognitive change score from baseline to 4 weeks in the LM group was noninferior to the DP group; likewise, no significant difference was observed between DP and HM. Noninferiority of LM versus DP, and lack of difference between DP and HM, remained for domain-specific cognitive change scores, except structured verbal memory, with noninferiority of LM versus DP not established and structured verbal memory better preserved in DP versus HM ( P = 0.036). There were no significant differences in structural or functional magnetic resonance imaging brain imaging between groups postoperatively. Regardless of temperature, patients who underwent HCA demonstrated significant reductions in cerebral gray matter volume, cortical thickness, and regional brain functional connectivity. Thirty-day in-hospital mortality, major morbidity, and quality of life were not different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized multicenter study evaluating arch surgery HCA temperature strategies found low-moderate hypothermia noninferior to traditional deep hypothermia on global cognitive change 4 weeks after surgery, although in secondary analysis, structured verbal memory was better preserved in the deep group. The verbal memory differences in the low- and high-moderate groups and structural and functional connectivity reductions from baseline merit further investigation and suggest opportunities to further optimize brain perfusion during HCA. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02834065.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Year in Aortic Surgery: Selected Highlights From 2023;Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia;2024-09

2. Optimization of Hypothermic Protocols for Neurocognitive Preservation in Aortic Arch Surgery: A Literature Review;Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease;2024-08-01

3. Cerebral Protection Strategies in Aortic Arch Surgery—Past Developments, Current Evidence, and Future Innovation;Bioengineering;2024-07-31

4. A Year of Changes: The End of the Pandemic Marks the Beginning of New Priorities;Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia;2024-05-10

5. Noteworthy in Cardiothoracic Surgery 2023;Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia;2024-04-17

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3