NIHSS Training and Certification Using a New Digital Video Disk Is Reliable

Author:

Lyden Patrick1,Raman Rema1,Liu Lin1,Grotta James1,Broderick Joseph1,Olson Scott1,Shaw Sandi1,Spilker Judith1,Meyer Brett1,Emr Marian1,Warren Margo1,Marler John1

Affiliation:

1. From the Departments of Neurosciences (P.L., R.R., S.O., B.M.) and Family and Preventive Medicine (R.R., L.L.), UCSD School of Medicine, and Neurology (P.L.), Veterans Administration Medical Center, San Diego, Calif; the Department of Neurology, University of Texas-Houston Medical School (J.G., S.S.), Houston, Texas; the University of Cincinnati Medical Center (J.B., J.S.), Cincinnati, Ohio, and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (M.E., M.W., J.M.).

Abstract

Background and Purpose— NIH Stroke Scale certification is required for participation in modern stroke clinical trials and as part of good clinical care in stroke centers. The existing training and certification videotapes, however, are more than 10 years old and do not contain an adequate balance of patient findings. Methods— After producing a new NIHSS training and demonstration DVD, we selected 18 patients representing all possible scores on 15 scale items for a new certification DVD. Patients were divided into 3 certification groups of 6 patients each, balanced for lesion side, distribution of scale item findings, and total score. We sought to measure interrater reliability of the certification DVD using methodology previously published for the original videotapes. Raters were recruited from 3 experienced stroke centers. Each rater watched the new training DVD and then evaluated one of the 3 certification groups. Results— Responses were received from 112 raters: 26.2% of all responses came from stroke nurses, 34.1% from emergency departments/other physicians, and 39.6% from neurologists. One half (50%) of raters were previously NIHSS-certified. Item responses were tabulated, scoring performed as previously published, and agreement measured with unweighted κ coefficients for individual items and an intraclass correlation coefficient for the overall score. κ ranged from 0.21±0.05 (ataxia) to 0.92±0.09 (LOC-C questions). Of 15 items, 2 showed poor, 11 moderate, and 2 excellent agreement based on κ scores. The intraclass correlation coefficient for total score was 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.84 to 1.00). Reliability scores were similar among specialists and centers, and there were no differences between nurses and physicians. κ scores trended higher among raters previously certified. Conclusions— These certification DVDs are reliable for NIHSS certification, and scoring sheets have been posted on a web site for real-time, online certification.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Advanced and Specialised Nursing,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Clinical Neurology

Reference11 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3