Remote Heart Failure Symptoms Assessment After Myocardial Infarction Identifies Patients at Risk for Death

Author:

Wohlfahrt Peter12ORCID,Jenča Dominik34ORCID,Melenovský Vojtěch3ORCID,Stehlik Josef5ORCID,Spertus John A.6ORCID,Mrázková Jolana7ORCID,Šramko Marek23,Kotrč Martin3ORCID,Želízko Michael3,Adámková Věra1ORCID,Piťha Jan3ORCID,Kautzner Josef38ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Preventive Cardiology Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic

2. First Medical School Charles University Prague Czech Republic

3. Department of Cardiology Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM) Prague Czech Republic

4. Third Medical School, Charles University Prague Czech Republic

5. University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT USA

6. University of Missouri Kansas City’s Healthcare Institute for Innovations in Quality and Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart Institute Kansas City MO USA

7. Experimental Medicine Centre Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM) Prague Czech Republic

8. Medical and Dentistry School Palacký University Olomouc Czech Republic

Abstract

Background Heart failure is a common complication after myocardial infarction (MI) and is associated with increased mortality. Whether remote heart failure symptoms assessment after MI can improve risk stratification is unknown. The authors evaluated the association of the 23‐item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) with all‐cause mortality after MI. Methods and Results Prospectively collected data from consecutive patients hospitalized for MI at a large tertiary heart center between June 2017 and September 2022 were used. Patients remotely completed the KCCQ 1 month after discharge. A total of 1135 (aged 64±12 years, 26.7% women) of 1721 eligible patients completed the KCCQ. Ranges of KCCQ scores revealed that 30 (2.6%), 114 (10.0%), 274 (24.1%), and 717 (63.2%) had scores <25, 25 to 49, 50 to 74, and ≥75, respectively. During a mean follow‐up of 46 months (interquartile range, 29–61), 146 (12.9%) died. In a fully adjusted analysis, KCCQ scores <50 were independently associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 6.05 for KCCQ <25, HR, 2.66 for KCCQ 25–49 versus KCCQ ≥50; both P <0.001). Adding the 30‐day KCCQ to clinical risk factors improved risk stratification: change in area under the curve of 2.6 (95% CI, 0.3–5.0), Brier score of −0.6 (95% CI, −1.0 to −0.2), and net reclassification improvement of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.45–1.04). KCCQ items most strongly associated with mortality were walking impairment, leg swelling, and change in symptoms. Conclusions Remote evaluation of heart failure symptoms using the KCCQ among patients recently discharged for MI identifies patients at risk for mortality. Whether closer follow‐up and targeted therapy can reduce mortality in high‐risk patients warrants further study.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3