Shifting From Active to Passive Monitoring of Alzheimer Disease: The State of the Research

Author:

Popp Zachary12ORCID,Low Spencer123ORCID,Igwe Akwaugo12,Rahman Md Salman12,Kim Minzae14,Khan Raiyan14,Oh Emily14,Kumar Ankita14,De Anda‐Duran Ileana5ORCID,Ding Huitong16,Hwang Phillip H.3ORCID,Sunderaraman Preeti267ORCID,Shih Ludy C.267ORCID,Lin Honghuang8ORCID,Kolachalama Vijaya B.29ORCID,Au Rhoda12367ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine Boston MA USA

2. Boston University Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine Boston MA USA

3. Department of Epidemiology Boston University School of Public Health Boston MA USA

4. Boston University Boston MA USA

5. Department of Epidemiology Tulane University School of Public Health & Tropical Medicine New Orleans LA USA

6. Framingham Heart Study Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine School of Medicine Boston MA USA

7. Department of Neurology Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine School of Medicine Boston MA USA

8. Department of Medicine University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School Worcester MA

9. Department of Medicine Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine School of Medicine Boston MA USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT Most research using digital technologies builds on existing methods for staff‐administered evaluation, requiring a large investment of time, effort, and resources. Widespread use of personal mobile devices provides opportunities for continuous health monitoring without active participant engagement. Home‐based sensors show promise in evaluating behavioral features in near real time. Digital technologies across these methodologies can detect precise measures of cognition, mood, sleep, gait, speech, motor activity, behavior patterns, and additional features relevant to health. As a neurodegenerative condition with insidious onset, Alzheimer disease and other dementias (AD/D) represent a key target for advances in monitoring disease symptoms. Studies to date evaluating the predictive power of digital measures use inconsistent approaches to characterize these measures. Comparison between different digital collection methods supports the use of passive collection methods in settings in which active participant engagement approaches are not feasible. Additional studies that analyze how digital measures across multiple data streams can together improve prediction of cognitive impairment and early‐stage AD are needed. Given the long timeline of progression from normal to diagnosis, digital monitoring will more easily make extended longitudinal follow‐up possible. Through the American Heart Association–funded Strategically Focused Research Network, the Boston University investigative team deployed a platform involving a wide range of technologies to address these gaps in research practice. Much more research is needed to thoroughly evaluate limitations of passive monitoring. Multidisciplinary collaborations are needed to establish legal and ethical frameworks for ensuring passive monitoring can be conducted at scale while protecting privacy and security, especially in vulnerable populations.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference87 articles.

1. U.S. Food & Drug Administration Digital Health Center of Excellence. 2020. Accessed 7 Apr 2023. https://www.fda.gov/medical‐devices/digital‐health‐center‐excellence/what‐digital‐health

2. Innovation process of mHealth: An overview of FDA-approved mobile medical applications

3. mHealth apps market size, growth, analysis report 2021–2028;Fortune Business Insights;Market Res Rep,2020

4. Digital biomarkers of mood disorders and symptom change

5. Digital Biomarkers of Social Anxiety Severity: Digital Phenotyping Using Passive Smartphone Sensors

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3