Value-Based Payment for Clinicians Treating Cardiovascular Disease: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association

Author:

Sandhu Alexander T.,Heidenreich Paul A.,Borden William,Farmer Steven A.,Ho P. Michael,Hammond Gmerice,Johnson Janay C.,Wadhera Rishi K.,Wasfy Jason H.,Biga Cathie,Takahashi Edwin,Misra Khamal D.,Joynt Maddox Karen E.,

Abstract

Clinician payment is transitioning from fee-for-service to value-based payment, with reimbursement tied to health care quality and cost. However, the overarching goals of value-based payment—to improve health care quality, lower costs, or both—have been largely unmet. This policy statement reviews the current state of value-based payment and provides recommended best practices for future design and implementation. The policy statement is divided into sections that detail different aspects of value-based payment: (1) key program design features (patient population, quality measurement, cost measurement, and risk adjustment), (2) the role of equity during design and evaluation, (3) adjustment of payment, and (4) program implementation and evaluation. Each section introduces the topic, describes important considerations, and lists examples from existing programs. Each section includes recommended best practices for future program design. The policy statement highlights 4 key themes for successful value-based payment. First, programs should carefully weigh the incentives between lowering cost and improving quality of care and ensure that there is adequate focus on quality of care. Second, the expansion of value-based payment should be a tool for improving equity, which is central to quality of care and should be a focal point of program design and evaluation. Third, value-based payment should continue to move away from fee for service toward more flexible funding that allows clinicians to focus resources on the interventions that best help patients. Last, successful programs should find ways to channel clinicians’ intrinsic motivation to improve their performance and the care for their patients. These principles should guide the future development of clinician value-based payment models.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference89 articles.

1. Schneider EC Shah A Doty MM Tikkanen R Fields K Williams RD 2nd. Mirror mirror 2021: reflecting poorly. the Commonwealth Fund. 2021. Accessed January 10 2022. https://commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2021/aug/mirror-mirror-2021-reflecting-poorly

2. Health Care Payment Learning & Action Network. Measuring progress: adoption of alternative payment models in commercial Medicaid Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare programs. December 15 2021. Accessed January 10 2022. https://hcp-lan.org/workproducts/apm-measurement-final.pdf

3. Health Care Payment Learning & Action Network. APM framework. 2017. Accessed January 10 2022. http://hcp-lan.org/workproducts/apm-refresh-whitepaper-final.pdf

4. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. How MIPS eligibility is determined. 2022. Accessed January 10 2022. https://qpp.cms.gov/mips/how-eligibility-is-determined

5. Time and Financial Costs for Physician Practices to Participate in the Medicare Merit-based Incentive Payment System

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3